User talk:Billybobhanson

Welcome!

Hello, Billybobhanson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Welcome to rockville, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 01:57, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Welcome to rockville

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Welcome to rockville requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 01:57, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Saving Abel has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Saving Abel was changed by Billybobhanson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950249 on 2013-06-09T19:58:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at I Set My Friends on Fire with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 20:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Carolina Rebellion may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Day 1 (Saturday, May 4th

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:22, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalizing Wikipedia

You are welcome to contribute to Wikipedia constructively, but all of your edits are getting reverted because they seem to be unhelpful, and a recent one is obviously vandalism. If this persists, you will be blocked from editing. -- Scray (talk) 20:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at I Set My Friends on Fire, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: I Set My Friends on Fire was changed by Billybobhanson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90378 on 2013-06-09T20:12:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The genres of Hollywood undead

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The genres of Hollywood undead requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.

Hollywood Undead

Hi, Hollywood Undead already has its own page, so there is no need to create a page to list genres of music for them. Thanks. Taroaldo ✉ 21:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Deftones, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Insulam Simia (^talk/_contribs) 18:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please stop adding genres to articles without consensus or citations. Insulam Simia (^talk/_contribs) 18:12, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. I call the big one bitey (talk) 20:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Insulam Simia (^talk/_contribs) 20:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 16:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 18:39, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruptive editing via genre warring. I've made the block of indefinite duration this time, that is you are blocked until you are able to demonstrate an understanding as to why you are blocked and endeavour not to repeat the same activities that led to your block. When you have been blocked two times previously for the same behaviour and then dive right back in when the block expires it does not instill confidence that you are able to edit in a collaborative and policy compliant fashion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 20:49, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]