User talk:Bklimok

Welcome to my "talk" page. Please write here and I will respond as soon as I am available.

Your submission at Articles for creation: HireInfluence, Inc. (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HireInfluence, Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:HireInfluence, Inc., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bklimok! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:HireInfluence, Inc.

Hello, Bklimok. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "HireInfluence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 13:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:HireInfluence, Inc.

Hello, Bklimok. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "HireInfluence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Influencer marketing. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 23:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Care to explain how it is promotional? What exactly am I promoting? HireInfluence, Inc is an authoritative source on influencer marketing, given that they have been in the space since 2011. The current sources listed reference authors that discuss the general definition of influencer marketing (not taking into account the digital evolution of the industry). Bklimok (talk) 23:35, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a reliable source, and you appear to have a conflict of interest. Grayfell (talk) 23:40, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it may appear as a conflict of interest because I tried to create a page for a company that has been verified as the first influencer marketing agency in the world. Yet it was rejected because some people view commercial intent given the company name may be interpreted as, "Hire Influence". How does the source not appear authoritative? I see influencermarketinghub.com listed as a source for Influencer marketing, when that website clearly sells sponsored listings on their website (See here). Bklimok (talk) 23:49, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"influencermarketinghub.com" is not reliable, either.

Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion or advocacy. An anonymous corporate blogs is almost never going to meet Wikipedia's standards for reliable sources. Since you are doubling down on promoting the website, this again suggests that you have a conflict of interest. Please carefully review Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may also find Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide helpful.

As those pages explain, if you are compensated for editing, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's terms of service. Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure provides more information about this. Grayfell (talk) 00:49, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If "influencermarketinghub.com" is not reliable either, why is it on Influencer marketing? Bklimok (talk) 23:13, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You mean why is in the article with the big banner across the top which says "Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable"? Yeah, that's a real mystery, isn't it. Grayfell (talk) 04:47, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't my question, but thanks for removing influencermarketinghub.com. Bklimok (talk) 19:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hireinfluence.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.hireinfluence.com