User talk:Bobo467

Speedy deletion nomination of The Big Lez Show

Hello Bobo467,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Big Lez Show for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 21:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from The Big Lez Show, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with The Big Lez Show. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 21:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at The Big Lez Show. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Wgolf (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at The Big Lez Show, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wgolf (talk) 21:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: The Big Lez Show

Hello Bobo467. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on The Big Lez Show to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Big Lez Show has been reverted.
Your edit here to The Big Lez Show was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://m.facebook.com/TheBigLezShow?id=279430782156730&refsrc=https://www.facebook.com/TheBigLezShow) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of Code Geass episodes, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 06:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Code Geass episodes. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 06:42, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Code Geass: Akito The Exiled (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Code Geass: Akito The Exiled.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Code Geass: Akito The Exiled concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Code Geass: Akito The Exiled, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Code Geass: Akito The Exiled

Hello Bobo467. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Code Geass: Akito The Exiled".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Code Geass: Akito The Exiled}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GamerPro64 03:37, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]