User talk:Bolla ch

Welcome!

Hello, Bolla ch, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Bolla ch, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GirthSummit _(blether) 22:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Bolla ch

A tag has been placed on User:Bolla ch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GirthSummit _(blether) 22:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Bolla ch (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As you will easily find out, Manuel Bolla is a Newcomer in music. He got over 10‘000 Klicks in one week on YouTube, even if he was not known to the public community bedore. Two days ago he got to the top 100 of most downloaded tracks on iTunes. Now he is under contract with Christopher Harriman (big fish in Holly wood)

It would be nonsensical to delete this page. Just edit out any advertisement like things if you like.

Thanks for reading.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted

As you will easily find out, Manuel Bolla is a Newcomer in music. He got over 10‘000 Klicks in one week on YouTube, even if he was not known to the public community bedore. Two days ago he got to the top 100 of most downloaded tracks on iTunes. Now he is under contract with Christopher Harriman (big fish in Holly wood)

It would be nonsensical to delete this page. Just edit out any advertisement like things if you like.

Thanks for reading.

Disclaimer We declare that Manuel Bolla was involved with writing this article. We tried our best to make it neutral. If you have suggestions to improve the writing or remove external links, feel free to write it in the talk section and edit this article. We would be very thankful if you didn’t just delete big parts without comments.

--Bolla ch (talk) 23:04, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a user page, not an article. It should be written in the first person (I am...), and can be used to tell other Wikipedia users a bit about yourself. See WP:UP for more information about user pages. If you follow the link to 'Your first article' in the welcome message above, you can find out more about creating an article rather than a user page.

As an aside, you refer to yourself as 'we' above - you should probably take a look at the no sharing rule part of our username policy - only one person is allowed to have access to any account.

I'm sorry this has probably not been the most friendly of welcomes - I hope that you will take the time to read through the links above and learn how to go about writing a real article. GirthSummit _(blether) 23:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, one other policy I should have mentioned - our conflicts of interest guidelines. There are certain steps you have to take if you are writing about yourself, or someone you know. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 23:27, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Panta Rhei 7

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Panta Rhei 7, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 00:16, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Bolla ch. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 00:46, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bolla ch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wrong editor and page; unfortunately my editor didn’t know the exact rules on Wikipedia and wrote in my name from my login on my personal page. Also he didn’t know about the zero tolerance for advertising. Instead the editor should have created a new page. Can you revert all changes on my page since yesterday snd unblock my login? Thank you

Decline reason:

Your unblock request does not make sense. Who is "my editor"? Do multiple people have access to this account? Please note that this is against our rules. Anyone who wants to edit Wikipedia must have their own account. It also sounds like you're a paid editor. In that case, you must comply with our paid editing disclosure. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 00:46, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly did happen? Why wasn't just the parts removed that conflict with the rules? Who can reverse this? Just delete the "advertisement"? Thanks Bolla ch (talk) 01:52, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly did happen? Why wasn't just the parts removed that conflict with the rules? Who can reverse this? Just delete the "advertisement"? Thanks Bolla ch (talk) 01:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bolla ch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A person who works with me knew very little about the rules here and I wasn't really into it as well. Now I would kindly ask to give me a chance to prove that I will very strictly follow the rules in the future. Thanks for your time and keep up the noble good work. Peace and happiness Bolla ch (talk) 12:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to be admitting to meatpuppetry, or saying that multiple people have access to this account(as the last reviewer stated). You must demonstrate that you understand the rules before you are unblocked, by explaining what rules you have violated, how you will not do so again, and what constructive contributions you will make. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 13:07, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.