User talk:Bourahioro

Bourahioro, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Bourahioro! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

May 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Once Upon a Time in Hollywood— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:24, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Once Upon a Time in Hollywood shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. bonadea contributions talk 17:46, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 17:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. Serols (talk) 17:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unblock decline July 11, 2017[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bourahioro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

did not realize there was a 3 strike rule within a 24 hour period. Will not edit in such a fashion from this point on. Bourahioro (talk) 16:17, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Thanks for your response. I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. You are only partly correct. Please read and heed the following.
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. You have not adequately addressed the reason for your block.

Please see our policy on edit warring. In the event of a content dispute, editors are required to stop reverting, discuss, and seek consensus among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.

Points to ponder:

Edit warring is wrong even if one is right.

Any arguments in favor of one's preferred version should be made on the relevant talk page and not in an unblock appeal.

Calling attention to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior.

To be unblocked, you must affirm an understanding of all of this, and what not to do, and what to do when in a content dispute. Thanks,
Also, please use edit summaries so other editors know why you are making changes. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Bourahioro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for quite some time now, and up until I was blocked, I had always amended pages without any sort of disruption. My actions in regards to the Once Upon A Time In Hollywood page, were, in retrospect, unbecoming, and disruptive. I was unaware that what I had been doing, would be poor conduct; Upon reflection, I understand that this behavior isn't acceptable, and I would refrain from such forms of conduct again, if my block were lifted Bourahioro (talk) 18:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Accept reason:

See below. Widr (talk) 20:20, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Bourahioro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I realize that my previous actions were more irritating than helpful. I chose poorly, in constantly editing the Once Upon a Time in Hollywood page; What I thought was helpful, in removing the plot of an unreleased (at that time) film, was more spam in nature. I understand that this is unnecessary, unwanted, and an incorrect manner of properly, and constructively editing pages on Wikipedia, and intend on refraining from such activities, going forward. Before the actions that resulted in my block, I was a productive editor, amending outdated pages about physical media, without incident. I fully take responsibility for my actions, and understand why they were wrong. As such, I am formally requesting my block to be lifted, so that I can contribute in a positive manner. Bourahioro (talk) 19:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Time has passed, and your request is reasonable; thus I am unblocking you. Widr (talk) 20:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back[edit]

Now that you are unblocked, you may remove anything you want from your talk page. Happy editing. Widr (talk) 20:24, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]