User talk:BoxingGuru78

Welcome!

Hello, BoxingGuru78, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Cheers,
Riley Huntley _talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 00:45, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Amir Khan (boxer). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC) I've cited reliable sources. Stop deleting my edit.BoxingGuru78 (talk) 10:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Amir Khan (boxer), you may be blocked from editing. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How is my editing defamatory and disruptive? I posted links with reliable sources.BoxingGuru78 (talk) 14:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's defamatory and disruptive because statements like that absolutely do not belong in the lead section of an article, as it violates WP:NPOV, particularly WP:WEIGHT. If you're so keen on highlighting the Brook–Khan saga, go ahead and collect a ton of high-quality, reliable sources—I'm talking five or more—and create a subsection for it in the article prose. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 14:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do that. But where does it say how many reliable sources I have to link? It's just, I don't often do any editing, so thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I couldn't find where it says I need 5 or more reliable sources though. BoxingGuru78 (talk) 14:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The idea is that if you're going to write stuff about Khan avoiding Brook, even with sources (yes, we all know he's ducking—that's not the point here), you must provide counter-arguments from Khan's side as well in order to balance things out and not give undue weight to either argument. Therefore, sources will have to be numerous and from a range of established publications. I just threw a figure out there to indicate that just one or two is not enough when it comes to highly contentious subjects like this. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 15:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sounds good. Thanks for the advice and suggestions, much appreciated. BoxingGuru78 (talk) 22:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Boogaloo movement, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]