User talk:Breath in and out

September 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Borderline personality disorder has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Borderline personality disorder was changed by Breath in and out (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885943 on 2013-09-20T10:21:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Technopat. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Borderline personality disorder, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 19:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Borderline personality disorder. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Please participate in the discussion on the article talk page instead of continuing to revert other users. Dawn Bard (talk) 19:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please join us on the BPD talk page

Hi there,

I've noticed that you've been trying repeatedly to add information about mindfulness to the borderline personality disorder article. You seem to be a new member of Wikipedia, so I wanted to make sure that you are aware of the guidelines about edit warring. You can click here for more information about the policy, but the short version is that if you undo other editors' removal of your material 3 or more times, you risk being blocked from editing. The preferred and more productive way of asserting your opinion about what material should be included is to discuss disagreements on article talk pages. We have just begun a discussion about the material you are trying to include, and you can join us by clicking here, which will take you to the borderline personality disorder talk page. We would appreciate your contributions to the discussion; please do not continue to revert the removal of your material without explaining why you feel it should be included. Firecatalta (talk) 20:02, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thank you for your note. I see that other editors have already provided you with useful links that will help you get the hang of how things are done here, and there is not much else I can add.

As for your specific question as to whether we can "allow the mindfulness section be there without references for two days" while you look for references, I'm afraid it is not possible, as it may violate the Wikipedia policy on Wikipedia:No original research. Finally, I must insist you follow the recommendations that others have already pointed out above and try to reach consensus on the article talk page rather than simply reverting other editors' editions. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 20:29, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Breath in and out! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits and articles of interest

Hi there,

I've clarified (hopefully) and updated the info in the psychotherapy section of the borderline personality disorder article. In particular, I've clarified that dialectical behavior therapy, also known as DBT, is based both on traditional cognitive-behavioral principles and on mindfulness principles. As the BPD page notes, this therapy is an effective treatment for BPD, and you can find more information about it here: dialectical behavior therapy. You might also be interested in this article: Mindfulness (psychology). Hope that helps, and again, please do join us on the BPD talk page.

Warm regards,

Firecatalta (talk) 21:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]