Jump to content

User talk:Bullšhit is the key

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Bullšhit is the key", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is a disruptive or offensive username. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you.Josh3580talk/hist 00:45, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Date rape has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to BBC News (TV channel), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:38, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Asshole (album), you may be blocked from editing. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:40, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at House of Anubis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:45, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is trolling or other disruptive behavior ever tolerated. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} on your user talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gamaliel (talk) 00:50, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bullšhit is the key (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

Your username isn't the only problem: you have a lot of vandalism to answer for, too. Writ Keeper  00:52, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bullšhit is the key (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

All right. The user name will change, sorry about the vandalism but it was mostly tests to see if it works. I will contribute constructively from here on. Deal? Bullšhit is the key (talk) 00:53, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is  Confirmed as one of a series of blocked vandalism-only accounts. Talkpage access removed, since serious unblock requests will not likely be forthcoming. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:07, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But you have already been instructed to use the sandbox for testing, and you ignored this instruction. — Smjg (talk) 01:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I concur with Smjg, there have been some edits of significant vandalism. However, if you are truly willing to contribute in a constructive manner, would you be willing to prove it to us? How about you pick the article that you wish to improve and post the improvements here on your talk page. If your edits are constructive, then we would allow you to create a different username and edit through that account. Mike VTalk 01:27, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:07, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]