Jump to content

User talk:BurtAlert/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4


You can take the bar

If you want, you can copy the bar's code onto your user pages off the top of my userpage. I don't mind! ;) Reaper Eternal (talk | contribs | block) 02:28, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! I've got to think of something good for next year, this April Fools' kind of snuck up on me. BurtAlert (talk) 22:35, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 backlog elimination drive report

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 Backlog elimination drive. Thank you for participating in the March 2011 drive! This newsletter summarizes the March drive and other recent events.

Participation
GOCE March 2011 backlog elimination drive progress graphs

There were 99 signups for the drive; of these, 70 participated. Interest was high mainly due to a link to our event from the Watchlist page. We had a record-breaking 84 articles listed on the Requests page in March; 11 of these have been promoted to Good article status so far. Several of our recent efforts have received Featured Article status as well, and the GOCE is becoming a solid resource for the Wikipedia community. Many thanks to editors who have been helping out at the Requests page and by copy editing articles from the backlog.

Progress report

Remarkable progress was made in reducing the backlog this month, as we now have fewer than 500 articles remaining from 2009. We are well under the 4,000-article mark for the total number remaining in the queue. Since our backlog drives began in May 2010 with 8,323 articles, we have cleared more than 53% of the backlog. A complete list of results and barnstars awarded can be found here. Barnstars will be distributed over the next week. If you enjoyed participating in our event, you may also like to join the Wikification drives, which are held on alternate months to our drives. Their April drive has started.

New coodinators

On March 21, SMasters appointed Chaosdruid (talk) and Torchiest (talk) as Guild coordinators to serve in place of The Utahraptor, who recently stepped down. Please feel free to contact any coordinator if you have any questions or need assistance.

Your drive coordinators – S Masters (talk), Diannaa (Talk) and Tea with toast (Talk)


Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 14:33, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi and Thanks

Thanks for welcoming me in to be a "Wikipedian"! I thank you for your warm welcome and helpful tips. Thank You also for the cookies! And- can you tell me what a "vandal" is? PanthalassaRex (talk) 22:10, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi there PanthalassaRex! Pretty much a vandal is someone who tries to disrupt Wikipedia. They may purposely add incorrect information, add insulting statements about living people, or simply add random text to pages. The reason that I have that message saying "attention vandals" on my edit notice is because I do alot of anti-vandalism work (meaning I revert uncontructive edits and report vandals to the administrators). That makes people mad, so sometimes they come to my talk page to cuss me out. The edit notice is meant to deter that. Anyway, I hope you enjoy Wikipedia and let me know if you have any other questions! BurtAlert (talk) 23:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

um

Burt, if you noticed, it's a handful of editors restoring a version while this same IP user keeps reverting everyone else. Might want to issue him the warning, not me. Using the talk page would be fruitless, unless documented consensus among the rest of us would stop the IP from reverting (unlikely).--Львівське (talk) 23:53, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

You mean myself, Lovetinkle, and APTOC, all of whom reverted your attempt to place two 21st-century Ukrainian WWII memorials in the "Communist propaganda" category? 24.47.118.12 (talk) 23:58, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
My mistake Lvivske, I just looked over the page history. Still, content disputes should be settled on the article's talk page. BurtAlert (talk) 02:08, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

error

I wrote an information article in Automotive Aftermarket weekly regarding the company I created a page for. The article was well written and the company chose to use it on their corporate page. This material is copyrighted by me and I am not paid nor affiliated with the company. A bot flagged it as spam, what do I do rewrite my entire article? I also listed a seven or eight associations in the industry on the page, should this be left out as they are sure to be linked hundreds of times on google? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jefeperro (talk • contribs) 20:34, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

I didn't flag your page, as I do not operate the bot. Since you are the copyright holder of the text, follow the instructions at WP:IOWN. The article will still have to meet notability guidelines for companies. Let me know if you have any other questions. BurtAlert (talk) 20:39, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

The Proposed Deletion of Pear (character)

Hello, BurtAlert, and I thank you for welcolming me into Wikipedia. But I have an objection about your suggestion to delete my article. Please read the article Pear (character)'s talk page, and reconsider your suggestion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fanfare25 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Fanfare25. Since you and another editor contested it, I removed the PROD. I did nominate the article for deletion, however. You can weigh in here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pear (character). BurtAlert (talk) 01:52, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, BurtAlert. May I ask, when will this discussion for the deletion of my article take place. (Please visit the talk page and reconsider your proposal.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fanfare25 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

It is discussed for seven days. You can go to the link I posted and write why you think it should be kept. Other editors will do that same. After seven days, an administrator will weigh the arguments (not just the number of keep vs. delete votes) and decide whether or not to delete the article. In the meantime, adding references from reliable sources and making sure that the article complies with our manual of style will help. BurtAlert (talk) 02:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Where do I write my reason of why I think it should be kept? Fanfare25 (talk) 03:02, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

Vandalism of Pierre Lewis Page

Hi BurtAlert,

please note that 89.243.223.206 has vandalised Pierre Lewis page. Please could you give them a warning. Many thanks for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.191.246 (talk) 13:11, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

I warned them, thanks for telling me about this. What's the deal with calling Mr. Lewis "Coombes" anyway? There has been quite alot of that on the article. BurtAlert (talk) 16:51, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Due to continuing vandalism, that user has also been blocked and the article was protected. Thanks for your help! BurtAlert (talk) 19:03, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks BurtAlert. The name relates to a relative of the artist. It seems to be the same individual each time trying to make this changes, via different IP addresses. I believe it might be someone with a altea motives to damage the artists name and work. Greatly appreciate your time and quick reactions to the situation. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.191.246 (talk) 21:12, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


Hi BurtAlert, Once again, 89.243.223.206 is trying to vandalise The Pierre Lewis page, please would you block / warn them. Many thanks for your time and understanding on this matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.191.246 (talk) 23:11, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I was away. It looks like another editor has dealt with it. The IP was blocked for a week. If they keep it up, the blocks will keep getting longer and longer. BurtAlert (talk) 23:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

E-mail

Hello, BurtAlert. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:54, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

ANI

No problems at all, it's always good to have as much info available as possible! Thanks and regards, GiantSnowman 18:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

GOCE drive newsletter

The Guild of Copy Editors – May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive

The Guild of Copy Editors invite you to participate in the May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive began on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). The goals of this backlog elimination drive are to eliminate as many articles as possible from the 2009 backlog and to reduce the overall backlog by 15%. ! NEW ! In an effort to encourage the final elimination of all 2009 articles, we will be tracking them on the leaderboard for this drive.

Awards and barnstars
A range of barnstars will be awarded to active participants. Some are exclusive to GOCE drives. More information on awards can be found on the main drive page.

We look forward to meeting you on the drive! Your GOCE coordinators: SMasters, Diannaa, Tea with toast, Chaosdruid, and Torchiest

You are receiving a copy of this newsletter as you are a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, or have participated in one of our drives. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add you name here. Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:09, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Scientology, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BurtAlert (talk) 02:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I only recall one case of doing this. In this case the user made a post that was basically exactly what I had but for some reason decided to put it directly above the edit I had already made.--69.243.192.193 (talk) 02:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:00, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

Lincoln Memorial section

We are currently attempting to bring the Abraham Lincoln article to FA status and are trying to establish consensus regarding images. Your consensus and opinion is needed on the Abraham Lincoln talk page. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 22:21, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BurtAlert/Archive_3&oldid=1232700928"