User talk:C.Tseytlin

Hello, C.Tseytlin, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement, and you may wish to read our newspaper The Signpost. Happy editing! Ronz (talk) 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Make History Honest Again (January 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

David.moreno72 13:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, C.Tseytlin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 13:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help request?

Howdy hello! You recently popped into IRC and asked a question, but didn't stick around for an answer. Can I help? CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 03:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Bulldozer

Hi C.Tseytlin. I saw you have twice edited the article on Bulldozer where you talk about how an original meaning of the word did not mean violence against black people in the southern US. But your citation says the opposite, as does the Oxford English Dictionary. I reverted your edit, letting you know just so you don't think I'm being a sneak. I can observe that, like me, you are about not exaggerating in these Wikipedia entries. HighAtop94 (talk) 02:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HighAtop94, thanks for your message and interest in ensuring accuracy. I reviewed the source I originally cited (a Dictionary from 1877 that cited a newspaper excerpt and a separate quotation illustrating its origin). While you say the source says the opposite of what I claim it does -- that the term bulldozing was political, not racial, the source speaks for itself. The first two examples given support the bipartisan use of bulldozing (by all races and all parties): 1) in Louisiana, there were Black political organizations that would "bulldose" Blacks who the Black org. suspected of voting for the opposing political party (Democrats); 2) as reported by the NY Tribune, in New Orleans, "bulldozers" was a term used to refer to organizations of armed white men to keep Blacks from voting Republican. The Dictionary then cites other newspapers around the country who used the term in situations where race was simply not an issue, like a Russian ship bulldozing through American waters.

I appreciate your dialogue, but my inclusion is important as it is an irrefutable historical fact that provides context to the term's origin. --C.Tseytlin (talk) 02:47, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your edit, I don't think you are correct. Saying that something is an "irrefutable historical fact" does not make it so. The Wikipedia article has three contemporary etymologist who refer to the racist origins of the word bulldozer. One quotes two different white intimidating black voter descriptions from 1876. And your own citation, as I describe above (and in your response you appreciate but do not address), does not support your statement that the term's origin also described white people intimidating black people. HighAtop94 (talk) 03:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the time to continue going back and forth with you about this. If you are so determined to perpetuate inaccurate information that is easily refuted with historical sources I provided, then so be it. You clearly did not review the sources I cited. C.Tseytlin (talk) 00:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]