User talk:CPATH10

Welcome

Hello, CPATH10, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 23:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

December 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Alton Towers was changed by CPATH10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855529 on 2012-12-05T16:51:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Your recent editing history at Casualty (series 28) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. –
– Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard|— 10:13, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Casualty (series 28), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. –
– Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard|— 10:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@ CPATH10 (talk
It is in violation of copyright (The BBC's)
We do NOT copy material from publications. We compose our own, otherwise we are in violation of copyright.
How can an original "short (plot) summary" be written PRIOR to the broadcast of the relevant episode?
Answer: "It can't".
Compose your own after you have watched the episode. –
– Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard|— 12:11, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Casualty (series 28), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
— | Gareth Griffith-Jones | The Welsh Buzzard | — 17:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Holby series/characters

Hi there, I know you've been doing a fair bit of contributing to the various Holby City series and character pages recently. I see you've been adding various wards after character's names and job titles, though I think it's got to a point where the lists are tending to look a little cluttered. As the editor who added the character lists to the individual series pages in the first place, the intention was to only include the ward that each characters usually appeared on - the one they were resident on - rather than just the wards that they popped up on from time to time. As such, this is why I've been keeping characters such as Guy Self and Colette Sheward in the list without a ward, as they do not appear to be formally allocated to a particular ward. Where there have been multiple wards listed, this has been due to the characters moving between wards over the course of the series, such as recently when Ric Griffin and Michael Spence swapped roles on Keller and AAU, respectively, during Series 15, hence their listing there as Keller/AAU and AAU/Keller. As such, I'm proposing, for brevity's sake, as well as for clarity, that the wards listed be kept to a minimum - each character's principal ward only, rather than any that they occasionally appear on (for argument's sake, pretty much all characters appear on AAU from time to time, but that doesn't mean they should have AAU listed after their names). The alternative is that we do away completely with having characters' wards listed after their names. I've reverted the list to its former appearance, in the process removing a couple of things (Dominic isn't on AAU, Edward (who, incidentally, left the show in Episode 13, and has been removed from the opening titles and the BBC website) wasn't on Keller, and Nathan and Mr Thompson were never given allocated named wards). Let me know what you think - it may be that the complete removal of wards may be the easiest way forward! Skarloey (talk) 22:22, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Casualty (series 25) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to William Beck and Linda Andrews

Alton Towers Resort (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Beastie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Alton Towers Resort because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! The Banner talk 21:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Holby City (series 16). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. The Banner talk 21:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alton Towers Resort, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beastie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Holby City (series 16), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Rain the 1 22:48, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at List of Holby City characters. Rain the 1 23:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Holby City (series 16), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Serena stopped being the clinical lead??? Rain the 1 21:40, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Holby City (series 17), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rain the 1 22:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:13, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

CPATH10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not vandalizing, I'm just making corrections, to incorrect information. I don't see any reason as to why I cannot do that, and I am quite distressed at the fact you think I'm just vandalizing Wikipedia. I now also understand how to add references, so I will do that in the future as well

Accept reason:

Your unblock request gives the impression there is nothing wrong with your editing apart from not adding references. Considering your talk page is full of notes from other editors about edit warring and making nonconstructive edits, I think your problems are more significant than just not adding references. In this context, I am declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 09:39, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]