User talk:Cabrianorange

Welcome!

Hello, Cabrianorange, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Flux & zoom web design, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Flux & zoom web design

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Flux & zoom web design, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, please use user space or draft space to work on complex topics that won't make sense initially. You are correct that it did sound like nonsense, so I have, as a favor to you, moved it out of article space. If you need help, ask at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you plan to work on the topic? You have six months to work on it, but, after complaining about its deletion, you don't appear to be working on it. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Cabrianorange (talk) 05:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have the copy with concept examples, it is a sub page of Adaptive Web Design. The concept of adaptive design is a popular type of design layout for the web, but the article had only a paragraph description when I started writing it. I plan to add more copy to the Adaptive Web Design page with concepts and images. I will post the new copy of Flux & Zoom Concept with layout examples. I was planing a 3rd page for Fluid Motion Editors Since they are new to web design.

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Responsive web design into Adaptive web design. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Flux & zoom web design

On 21 December 2016, you created the article Flux & zoom web design. I found it incomprehensible, and tagged it for speedy deletion. You objected to speedy deletion, saying that you needed 24 hours or so to word it in a way that didn't appear to be nonsense. In response to your comment, I moved it to draft space. You have not worked on it. While there is no requirement for you to work on it in draft space, I would like to know whether you have any plans to edit it further. I see that most of your editorial attention has instead been on Adaptive web design, and that I don't understand what your modifications to it are trying to say either. If you are editing Wikipedia, please reply. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:09, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon (talk)

Since flux zoom is a part of Adaptive web design I was finishing that article first. I can work on Flux & zoom web design also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.98.54.128 (talk) 05:52, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I wrote all but a paragraph of it as 68.98.54.128 and current user, what is the problem with it. Cabrianorange (talk) 09:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still would need all additional information and sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Cabrianorange/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Adapative Flux & Zoom

Hello, Cabrianorange. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adapative Flux & Zoom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 14:55, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]