User talk:Carptrash/Archive04

catalog numbers for books

Hi ... I just ran in to this discussion Talk:List_of_Adolf_Hitler_books#I_was_rather_surprised. If you're still looking for an ISBN for the book you mentioned, you can see it at this link OCLC 11888468. Kind Regards, Keesiewonder 12:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note! I think I've only seen Pulis from a distance, like at a dog show or something. i.e. I don't think I've ever had a chance to pet one. What color is yours? Are they one of the dogs whose fur can be used for spinning? Keesiewonder 23:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing ... I find it useful to provide an ISBN or if that is not available an OCLC for books that I list. Especially if it is not one that is commonly known and is in an article that may be controversial. If I cannot find an ISBN, OCLC, LCCN or ASIN for a book, and no library that I can be in touch with seems to have it (because of a terrible typo, say, in the author's name), then I may have serious doubts as to whether or not the book even exists. Just my perspective. Keesiewonder 23:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:AudreyMunsonInspiration.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:AudreyMunsonInspiration.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Yamla 22:22, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You said: "thumb|88px|leftI just discovered your message regarding the copyright issues with Image:AudreyMunsonInspiration.jpg. Here is the story that goes along with that, and you can feel free to do the right thing. I wrote the article on Audrey Munson some time ago and at the time wanted to get a picture to show something about her movie career. I was mostly interested in her as a model for sculptors and other artists. So I got on the www and found the fellow who owned the rights to the picture and explained wikipedia to him and he said, "Sure, go ahead and use it." His name is included in whatever copyright information I included. I tend to hold on to such email, but I've suffered many computer crashes, system changes, etc since and might not still have the correspondence. Anyway, I'll look for it, and that's my pitch."

Okay, I'm guessing this picture is old enough to be public domain now. Any way to identify what year it was created? That's the easiest approach here. Otherwise, if it is new enough to still be covered by copyright, I think we are just going to have to ditch the image. But I think it is probably old enough. --Yamla 00:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You helped me out before, so . . . . . . . . . . . . ...............

I need some help setting up a Category page. What I'd like to see on wikipedia is Category: Sculptors who exhibited at the 3rd Sculpture International. More and more of the artists who were there are showing up at wikipedia, so there are (opinion) enough to get the category going. Here is a handful of them. Chaim Gross, Pablo Picasso, C. Paul Jennewein, Albert Wein, Adolph Alexander Weinman, Jo Davidson, Milton Horn, Jacques Lipchitz and more. There are 250 in all, though most of those are not in wikipedia . . .... yet. Anyway. I am hoping that you can set this page, or whatever, up for me. Life is good. Carptrash 00:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted [[Category:Sculptors who exhibited at the 3rd Sculpture International]] - I've added Chaim Gross as the first entry - good luck Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 07:48, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sculpture

Part of the memorial placed by Ann Bellamy Lynn to her husband George at St Mary's church Southwick, Northamptonshire

I see that you have an interest in sculpture pics - you might be interested in this one of a sculpture by Louis-François Roubiliac that I took last year in a small village church near me Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 17:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot archiving

I see that this page is showing as being too big and needs archiving - you might want to automate this with a bot - just crib the instructions from the top of my talk page (altered appropriately and bob's your uncle! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 17:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CneihausNJ.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:CneihausNJ.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Butseriouslyfolks 10:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. No problem -- glad I did something right. I'm new here and a little paranoid about running afoul of the long list of rules. But happy to help. -- Butseriouslyfolks 17:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AnimalSacrificeToday.jpg

I nominated Image:AnimalSacrificeToday.jpg for deletion because it is speculative and probably an example of original research. --Yath 21:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for alerting me about the animal sacrifice picture. I went and tendered an opinion and am curious as to what will happen next. Life is supposed to be interesting. Carptrash 03:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested

Vote early, vote often

in getting people to vote about this picture which was just removed from the sacrifice article, so am contacting everyone recent on my talk page. Please consider taking a few minutes, looking it over, and voicing an opinion. Thanks. Carptrash 04:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply: Let us Build the sum total of human knowledge --Bhadani 04:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry we don't agree on this issue, but I know you wouldn't want me to be anything other than objective. Fascinating photo in any event. -- Butseriouslyfolks 05:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion re: "Sacrifice" photo

I really do think it would be a good idea to take the photo to a local university anthropologist. Now if you do, there's a distinct possibility you'll get this response: "Oh, yeah, I've seen dozens just like that, here's my paper on it", in which case it would immediately become verifiable. Another response could be: "Fascinating, I must study this", which would be even more interesting, though it wouldn't make the sacrifice verifiable until there's a study. The other major possible response would of course be this: "Oh, that's probably just some jerk messing around with a dead dog," which is why the image is just not suitable for Wikipedia as of now. The problem is, we just don't have verifiable information that anyone habitually sacrifices dogs in this manner. Thanks.--Pharos 05:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested

Vote early, vote often

Hello. You write to me: "in getting people to vote about this picture which was just removed from the sacrifice article, so am contacting some of the folks who have contributed to the page. Please consider taking a few minutes, looking it over, and voicing an opinion. Thanks. Carptrash 04:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)"[reply]

I don't can't this picture. I'm just only add Polish version article pl:Ofiara. I poore understanding English language but sorry if you i'm wrong and write error. Bye Stepa 06:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As I understand it, the objection to use of the photo appears to be that one doesn't know whether the animal was sacrificed or not. It certainly has a ritual appearance of some sort. But perhaps the animal died first, not having been intentionally killed by anyone, and then someone performed a commemorative ritual by placing stones around it. Considering the uncertainty involved, why not include the photo with a caption along the lines of, "The sacrifice of an animal often entails some sort of ritual arrangement or placement of the corpse. The careful display of the dead animal seen in this photo suggests that it may have been sacrificed, although this is not known with certainty. The photo was taken by a hiker in New Mexico who happened on the scene."

[Here you might add, if you know, some information as to whether people living in the vicinity, perhaps native Americans, have any history or tradition of engaging in animal sacrifice.]

I hope this helps you decide! MdArtLover 15:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome; thanks for thinking of me. Sorry I couldn't vote to keep it. It must have been quite startling when you found it, though. Do you know whether such sacrifice is common where you found it? Maybe someday, you're photo will be in high demand! Keesiewonder ^talk 16:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The observant rock is excellent! Has someone analyzed what they feel is depicted in it? A face, etc.? And the photo has the highly desired token red (remembrance?) blooms. One thing that is hard to see in the photo that the carcass is in fact a dog ... looks more fox like from the bit I can see. It is hard to get a sense of size from the photo since there isn't anything in it that I immediately see for scale purposes. A 75 lb. dog is a pretty big dog. Keesiewonder ^talk 17:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh puppins! I hope she lived a good, long happy life there-after! Keesiewonder ^talk 18:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That other photo is a wonderful bit of folk art! -- Butseriouslyfolks 18:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note - I agree witht he comments above about adding a note to the page to set the context. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 07:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for the thumbs up. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 03:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 10:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:JMMarquette.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JMMarquette.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Marquette Building (Chicago)

I haven't heard from you in a while. You seem to be continuing your positive contributions. Thanks for the edits to Marquette Building (Chicago). I have been a bit remiss myself, but I am trying to get in the habit of citing references properly now that I am the defacto administrator of the CHICOTW. If you look at some of the recent articles there you can see what the citation method I am trying to use. Is it possible you could cite as per the notice that I added to the top of the article page that I just added. TonyTheTiger 21:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying where your great additions came from. TonyTheTiger 16:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. No promotion except in my mind. I just tell myself I am the defacto CHICOTW administrator to keep myself motivated to try to keep it running and get people interested in it. I am not sure it is working. TonyTheTiger 16:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I had nabbed my first vandal yesterday, but TigerShark is giving me no love. It was my first posting at WP:AIV. TonyTheTiger 19:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All of a sudden everyone is visiting Marquette Building (Chicago) and helping. I finally got motivated to clean up the citations. TonyTheTiger 18:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The final determination is that dispite an IP address with 12 vandalism warnings for its 37 edits including 4 edits on 3 articles on the day I reported it to WP:AIV, it was determined that the vandal was likely inactive at the moment since it had been a 3 hours since the last posting. He posted edit 38 today. TonyTheTiger 18:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brookie here

Hi - I found another larger picture of theLouis-François Roubiliac Southwick memorial picture which I posted to you some while ago -enjoy! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 08:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

core shamanism

Surprisingly, I still remember that three month old tagging. I'm not going to delete that statement any time soon, I'd rather that someone cite it instead. Do you have any way of citing those Harner shamans' complaints? I mean, can you just cite that they complained about this? Have they published it anywhere, or has anyone else published about their complaints? Any of that would be helpful. — coelacan talk — 09:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Carptrash,

I kind of feel sympathy for your worries about original research. I sometimes shiver at what the patrols might do about creative research next, once they observe it to escape their whittering breath of immortality. Maybe what they really want is to immitate an encyclopedia...

Sorry have to go, duty calls (could talk for hours though)

So long, (Lunarian 14:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

License tagging for Image:PhallicTombstone2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PhallicTombstone2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

..for the "thumbs up" thingy, a very kind gesture indeed! But remember it was your good self that started the ball rolling in the first place - a daunting list to wikify! Cheers la, Vera, Chuck & Dave 18:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On The Road Again

Being of the meathead/meatball variety myself and, contrary to rumour, not that much of a Dickhead I'm perhaps not the best authority on that phallus thing (could be a lingam though), but I'm sure to trust you with the expertise. Visiting your Userpage I had this great feeling of Déja vu; that "Wired" thing brought it home. It's "On The Road"...That great highway in the sky, the dharma bums...

Boy, am I glad nobody ever made you a professor. Nobody ever volunteered to make me one, either. Those were the wise nobodies. And now we have so many volunteering to make us as good as themselves. That's fame I guess (the silly b*ggers)

About the expertise thing. For a moment I thought "Man and His Symbols" by Carl Jung, Jaffé e.a. might give, but it just skirts the issue. Section 3, by Henderson in the last few paragraphs of his contribution (can't well cite, have it in French) gets very close with his analysis of a sky rocket (related to phallic symbolism of Hermes). At least it has a very suggestive fotograph. I am sure you know it. Still have not had a clear read of the Phallus article though.

Now, if we could prove that towers sometimes take off like sky rockets...HA! The b*ggers are panicking already!

Yes your right, its Lunarian wishing you many of your best days ahead but he forgot to sign in (again)

(84.193.171.37 00:59, 12 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

PS Why do I suddenly have this hunch that if someone were to put a more explicit (or more popular) foto on the Lingam page he would be in BEEG trouble ? (Lunarian 01:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

PPS It's allright. I saw the discussion Let's just give them something else to chew on. Like the poet said: ONWARDS (Lunarian 01:59, 12 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

License tagging for Image:KitHIAmThe Light.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KitHIAmThe Light.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Brother Can You Spare A Dime ?

The seven cents that go around come around: Here

So long,

(Lunarian 11:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

PS Of course, we poor amateurs, it is so obvious !!!

Check this out and go for it!

(Lunarian 12:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

A Dog's Welcome

At Looney's

See you in Dixon,

(Lunarian 00:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

WikiProject Military History elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 13:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

stop asking everybody this question

the elections are absolutely not the right place to ask such specific question on an article. Try the milhist project's talk page and the wikiprojekt archeology. Wandalstouring 19:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Battle of Cieneguilla

Well, it's probably something to consider on a case-by-case basis. Here, the archaeologist clearly has access to the transcripts; the question is whether they're something the general public can get at (in which case you'd have a fairly legitimate claim for using them as primary sources).

In any case, I look forward to actually seeing an article for this topic; it seem like it'd be quite interesting to read. Kirill Lokshin 21:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thumbs up Carptrash. I learned alot of stuff while working on the article. Much appreciated. -- Szvest - ^{Wiki me up ®} 19:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI...Cantonment Burgwin has just been created. -- Szvest - ^{Wiki me up ®} 12:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now I see that John Davidson (general) has suddenly appeared. I went to Santa Fe (the capitol of New Mexico) two days ago - went to the State Library and Historical Archives and found a copy of his biography by his grandson, Xeroxed the pages regarding the Battle of Cieneguilla and am reviewing those. The real interesting part of his story (opinion) begins when he returns to the West after the Civil War as on officer for the Buffalo Soldiers. Now I will have to get that book again. HOWEVER - our connection began when you responded to a question of mine regarding original research. I have now found the letter from Lt. Bell written shortly after Cieneguilla in which Bell, who was out here (Northern New Mexico) at the time presents a very different view of the fight and makes some of the allegations that lead to the Official Inquiry. A typed version of Bell's letter was given to me by the archeologist who was investigating the battle a few years ago and I have no idea how, or even IF the general public could access it. So do I use the letter in the article or not? Actually I will use it, but and any one else, will get to decide if the POV contained in it is admissible or not. Life . It is supposed to be interesting. I also have a large piece of the transcript of the Court of Inquiry that I hope to get around to including. Carptrash 15:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When i titled the sections "The role of Lieutenant Davidson" and "Court of inquiry" i wanted to give a context to the battle. I am not meaning by that that i wanted to focus on Davidson's mishandling of the battle or the opposite but i just wanted to focus on the encyclopaedic aspect of the battle. So, IMHO, the letter is of a high encyclopaedic value and should be mentioned. However, we should not, in any case, argue about its content. In other words, we can only state what's in it without judging its content (i.e. saying the allegations are right or not). This approach respects the nature of NPOV. If we read carefully the article as it is now, we will notice that the two sections above-mentioned do not give credit to neither Bell nor Davidson and so should be the letter. We only state facts and cannot analyze. Cheers. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up ®} 17:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brazen Firm

A finishing touch perhaps ? :)

(Lunarian 13:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Re: Image:SherzerFire1.jpg

I marked this image as a candidate to go to Commons as it is a freely licensed image, you created it after all. Free images should be hosted on Commons: and not Wikipedia, as then they are available to be used in all Wikimedia projects. The Commonshelper is a tool designed to expedite that process. If your other self-made pics should be moved there too.--Nilf anion (talk) 08:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Thanks for the message. I am very new to wikipedia (obviously). I don't know what a waymarker is, but thats probably the case. I just got bored. I really like the way that wikipedia entries show up in google earth, so I thought I would add some coordinates in where there weren't any. Thanks for the tip about adding to my profile. I'll give that a shot.

Thanks for the tips. The mking part of my name refer to my middle initial and last name. I know most folks prefer more anonymous handles online but I feel this is easier and I dont really buy into all the conspiracy theories and privacy issues. Personal preferences i guess. I obviously live in Chicago and photography is a little hobby of mine so hopefully I can add some gems to the 'pedia. Edwardmking 03:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Arthur Ashe

Yeah, I've semi-protected the above-mentioned article for 16 hours as it seems to be getting more vandalism that it should in a day. Hopefully the problem won't be back after it expires. :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 18:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 18:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the additions to Detroit buildings and for the blue color on my username. Notice the photos for Detroit have the Category:Images of Detroit, Michigan and Images of Michigan in [[ ]]. There is a lot to write about with respect to metro Detroit. We have a long way to go. Hope to see more photos. Keep me posted. Thomas Paine1776 18:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Coordinators

Hello Carptrash. Thanks for your support at the Military history taskforce. I am now a coordinator. Please feel free to approach me if you need any help. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up ®} 13:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've earned

my support and will continue to have it. Meanwhile I have tracked down the recent scholarship about the Battle of Cieneguilla - one is in a new book costing $175, so I won't be buying it - and am corresponding with the fellow about to publish more. I am not inclided to make too many changes until he does publish - but I want to thank you for really getting the article started, it is now becoming something real. Carptrash 16:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your trust again. Well, since you are still in contact w/ the researcher than that's good news. I'll be watching the article and help in case it is needed. Cheers. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up ®} 16:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely Photograph!

I loved the mural that you photographed and linked to on my talk page. Its very whimsical and imaginative. Keep up the excellent photography work.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

checking, 1,2,3

Hello Detroit Architectural contributers: The following category Category:Buildings with sculpture by Corrado Parducci is up for deletion. (I don't know how to make a link to it) You can vote for or against this action. Please consider doing this here. It is number 1:34 Thanks Carptrash 03:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Corrado Parducci sculptures category

Yes, fun. Thanks for all your contributions, they are wonderful, and much appreciated. Comment on my last entry under the Corrado Parducci category discussion. Voted to keep it. Perhaps we can settle the naming for them if you comment so they won't delete. Thomas Paine1776 18:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Award

		The Original Barnstar
		For your many fine contributions of images and content! Dreadlocke ☥ 05:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you like it! You definitely earned it with some great work. Yep, I'm well over eighteen and would enjoy that beer sometime! Dreadlocke ☥ 17:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

UDM and Corrado Parducci

No, not clairvoiant as much I have tried in life, never worked. It is right in the Corrado Parducci article itself that some of his work was at UD(nowM). If you ever have time or inclination that article could be expanded, you obviously do have quite a lot of info on him but its totally up to you, the article is okay now. --Mikerussell 06:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A map of his work around Detroit would be quite interesting, although I have no idea how it would look or how much work is involved in that. You must have been at Eastern when George Gervin was there? Around that time if you mention Haywood, or am I off a few years? As a kid growing in Toronto I used to have a big "Iceman" poster on my wall of Gervin when he was still playing with the Spurs.--Mikerussell 16:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gargoyle picture

Hi there - sorry for not getting back to you sooner. I very seldom bother to log in to Wikipedia nowadays, so it's typically about a month before I notice messages left for me!

Anyway, you left a comment about a gargoyle picture of mine. As I recall, I've contributed two photographs to the article - one is a grotesque on the gallery of Notre Dame in Paris, and the other is looking down on the channel in a gargoyle on Sacre Coeur in Paris.

Both of those appear to still be on the article. Was there a different photograph that you were asking about? - MykReeve T·C 14:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gargoyle edit

Thanks for taking the time to stop by my user page and offer a newb some advice Dr.croft 22:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beginnings of Art Deco

1910 is a good starting date for Art Deco because the beginning of Art Deco was influenced by the Futurist painter's manifesto of 1910 and the Armory Show of 1913 where the Cubist painters inspired early Art Deco. Already by 1913, early Art Deco set designs were being created and by 1916 Art Deco tile designs were appearing on buildings. Keraunos 04:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If you are originally from Iceland or have relatives there, you might be interested to look at the article I wrote 100% of on the color Rose. Go to the color Thulian Pink which is in that article and you will see that another name for Thulian Pink is Icelandic Pink. Best wishes, Keraunos 04:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC) P.S. I created the Shades of Pink Color Comparison Chart 2/3 of the way down the article on the color Rose and I expanded the Shades of Pink color template at the bottom of the article from 10 to 35 different shades of pink. Yours, Keraunos 04:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

How did you know that I got into a dispute with the administrators? I am new to wiki so I wanted to know if you're an administrator. I guess I'll edit my page later. I wanted to know how to upload pics. If you can send a link to a page that will direct me, please let me know. Thanks for all your help. Peanuts5402 02:53, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for the thumbs up award. It's nice to get an award for doing something you love. If you ever need anything spell-checked, I can do it. It's one of my passions.
So thank you again, that was a lovely surprise.
Have a wonderful day! ^_^
Saber girl08 01:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My moms favorite song of Linda Ronstadt is "Love is a Rose". If you could play that, I know both of us would love it. I enjoy the song too. Have a wonderful day!
Saber girl08 02:05, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, did you see? I just created a page for Love is a Rose! It's my first page, so it's probably bad, but if you could look at it, I'd be thrilled. I know there is a lot to do, and I'm going to try to do it, but I woud love to have some advice if there are any glaring problems.
Saber girl08 02:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working with an admin and between the two of us, this page is looking pretty decent. I still need to add info about Linda Ronstadt, which I will do in a bit, but this page is starting to finally look like a real page.
Saber girl08 03:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what else the page needed - do I need to put a lot of information about her, or just information pertaining to the song? It's hard to find information on this song that's specifically about/by her, because Youngs results keep coming in as well. I wasn't sure if I could put that, or if I should make the page for both of their versions of the song. If you have any ideas, I'd be very thankful. Have a good day!
Saber girl08 13:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your help!
Saber girl08 04:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible renaming of Wikipedia:WikiProject Saints

It has been suggested that the above named project be renamed Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian saints. Please express your opinion on this proposed renaming, and the accompanying re-definition of the scope of the project, here. John Carter 17:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wirt Rowland

See what you think of Wirt C. Rowland edit. Love those Corrado Parducci scupture photos, place insert a gallery for each Detroit building. Thomas Paine1776 00:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second W. S. Stratton statue

It's not the greatest foto, but I did have a picture of the Stratton statue in downtown Colorado Springs, and I have uploaded it to the article. No equestrian statue here. "Winfield Scott Stratton" is clearly legible on the base of the statue. It's obviously on Nevada Avenue, but I forget the cross street.Plazak 03:03, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Thanks for the photos. Let's have some more! Need University of Detroit photos, especially U-D Law School downtown Dowling Hall at 651 E Jefferson. Bankers Trust at Congress & Shelby in Detroit (is that Parducci's work?), the detailed facade in the arches of Cadillac Place (is that Parducci's carving?), Detroit Free Press building (321 West Lafayette) by Albert Kahn, Metropolitan Building at 33 & John R, and the Hurbut Memorial Gate at Waterworks Park (E Jefferson at Cadillac Blvd). Also need photos of Cranbrook House, Cranbrook School at 39221 Woodward, Cranbrook Academy of Art, Cranbrook Science Institute, there is already a photo of the Cranbrook Art Museum, but some better close ups of the statues would be nice, Christ Church Cranbrook, Belle Isle Scott Fountain, Louis Kamper's Eighth Precinct looks like a "Castle" at 4150 Grand RiverThomas Paine1776 22:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An excellent photo angle would be a color one of the Michigan Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument (Randolph Rogers sculpture) with the new emerald green glass One Kennedy Square in the background on Campus Martius. There is one like this in the external link under One Kennedy Square for Downtown Detroit Photographs. Then another photo of the monument with the golden topaz Compuware World Headquarters. Also, are you aware of the magnificent facade of Detroit Cornice & Slate Co (1897) at 733 Antoine. Wirt Rowland was the Architect for the Bankers Trust Company (1925) (low rise) at Congress & Shelby, so it seems Parducci would have had to have done the magnificent sculptures. If you haven't seen them, let me know. Albert Kahn designed the Detroit Trust Company a different one at 201 West Fort & Shelby.Thomas Paine1776 01:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's up?

I just saw your edit to your user page. What's happening? Please feel free to respond here or on my talk page. I think you're too good of a contributor for us to want to lose if we can avoid it. John Carter 15:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]