User talk:Catacamaya

Welcome!

Hello, Catacamaya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Alkoholen delirium. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Rob van vee 16:39, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Naturopathy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Naturopathy was changed by Catacamaya (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873331 on 2015-09-16T11:48:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:48, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Naturopathy with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Petrb (talk) 11:52, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is about consensus

Regarding your recent edits at Naturopathy: you are editing against consensus. The common consensus about naturopathy is that it is a pseudoscience in that there is no clinical evidence for the efficacy of its treatments. If you wish to change that consensus, you'll need to open a discussion at Talk:Naturopathy. Attempts to rewrite the article to remove claims that it is a pseudoscience, without proper discussion first, will simply be reverted. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]