User talk:CdeVNdeP

Welcome!

Hello, CdeVNdeP, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Skarmory (talk • contribs) 17:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hi CdeVNdeP! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 07:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saoirse Ronan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 18:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jack Lowden. Note also I specifically told you not to mark any edit that changed content as minor. The addition of that material was clearly not minor. DrKay (talk) 18:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Adelaide Kane. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Colony of Jamaica. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 21:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Adelaide Kane, you may be blocked from editing. This is not a minor edit. DrKay (talk) 21:10, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Llewellyn baronets. This is not a minor edit. DrKay (talk) 21:59, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Frederik Kaarle I of Finland" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Frederik Kaarle I of Finland and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Frederik Kaarle I of Finland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 07:30, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Maria I of Russia" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Maria I of Russia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Maria I of Russia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 07:30, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Elizabeth I of Brazil" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Elizabeth I of Brazil and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Elizabeth I of Brazil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 07:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Louis I of Brazil" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Louis I of Brazil and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Louis I of Brazil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 07:37, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Nicholas III of Russia" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Nicholas III of Russia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Nicholas III of Russia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 07:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Georg Friedrich I, King of Prussia" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Georg Friedrich I, King of Prussia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Georg Friedrich I, King of Prussia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 07:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Louis Ferdinand I, King of Prussia" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Louis Ferdinand I, King of Prussia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Louis Ferdinand I, King of Prussia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 07:49, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Georg Friedrich I, German Emperor" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Georg Friedrich I, German Emperor and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Georg Friedrich I, German Emperor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 07:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Louis Ferdinand I, German Emperor" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Louis Ferdinand I, German Emperor and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Louis Ferdinand I, German Emperor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 07:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"William III, German Emperor" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect William III, German Emperor and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#William III, German Emperor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 07:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Aimone I of Italy" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Aimone I of Italy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Aimone I of Italy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 07:52, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"John IV of France" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect John IV of France and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#John IV of France until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 07:57, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Edward III of Portugal" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Edward III of Portugal and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Edward III of Portugal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 08:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Edward II of Portugal" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Edward II of Portugal and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Edward II of Portugal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 08:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Michael II of Portugal" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Michael II of Portugal and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Michael II of Portugal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 08:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmetic changes

Please don't make changes to the wikicode that have no affect on the actual article, as you did at Stroma. These kinds of changes could only be made with another substantive change. Cosmetic changes are considered "watchlist clutter". Thanks. MB 03:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saoirse Ronan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abortion in Ireland. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

[1][2][3]

Something look familiar to you? Are you all three? Are you all working together? If not, how do you explain adding the same material? GBFEE (talk) 20:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:SCPSLBFCPCFB per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SCPSLBFCPCFB. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 04:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]