User talk:ChJameel
Indus Highway is a major road of Pakistan. It starts at Jamshoro near Hyderabad. When completeded it shall shave off the distance between Karachi and Peshawar by 200 km.
What I wrote about Kalki Avatar of Hindus was removed by AA saying (was this meant for talk?)
Therfore I reinserted it with the comments below
This was not meant for the talk page. It shows traditions in even Non_Abrahamic religions about Imam Mehdi.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by ChJameel (talk • contribs)
- Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Please consult Wikipedia's policies regarding original research and synthesis. What you wrote about Kalki Avatar can be inserted if you can provide a citation to a WP:reliable source who makes this assertion. --Richard (talk) 00:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 10:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
May 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User:Stallions2010 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Nsaa (talk) 12:56, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 18:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 16:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Two-Nation Theory. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 22:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I have put those views in a seperate article
Pakistani viewpoint about creation of Bangladesh
Because I find the section
Creation of Bangladesh
In the aritcle Two nation Theory very offensive and against Two nation theory. It is not neutral at all. It is anti-Pakistani.
--ChJameel (talk) 22:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
If you make any further racist/hate-speech related comments, as you did here, you will be blocked. --Ragib (talk) 22:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
If somebody call my country den of squalor then that is not racist/hate speech. And replying to that is. WHY ?
--ChJameel (talk) 22:53, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Let me quote precisely what you wrote there: "It good that Qadianis are leaving Pakistan the land of the Pure. They should go to Britain after all Mirza was a British agent.". By any measure, this is an objectionable speech, spewing religious-hatred against a minority. Please refrain from making such comments. --Ragib (talk) 23:02, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Created a new page
[edit]called
Pakistani viewpoint about creation of Bangladesh
--ChJameel (talk) 23:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Created a new page The Ideology of Pakistan
[edit]Created a new page The Ideology of Pakistan which REDIRECTS to Two-Nation Theory.
--ChJameel (talk) 11:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
[edit]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 17:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Created a new page Syed Miran Mohammad Shah
[edit]Created a new page Syed Miran Mohammad Shah.
He remained speaker of Sindh legislative Assembly, Minister Sindh Government, Ambassadar of Pakistan in Spain.
--ChJameel (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Created a new page Dr. Muhammad Ismail Nami
[edit]He was a Homoeopathic doctor, social worker, founder of Khalid Memorial Welfare Society and Sindh Homoeopathic Medical College Hyderabad located near Guru Nagar and Pakka Kila, remained President of National Council for Homoeopathy. He was the most famous homoeopath of Hyderabad during his lifetime.
--ChJameel (talk) 12:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Previously had created a new page Choudry Mohammad Sadiq
[edit]Previously had created a new page Choudry Mohammad Sadiq
Choudry Mohammad Sadiq (born 1900 in Batala, Gurdaspur district; died 1975). Graduated from Islamia College, Lahore and obtained his law degree in 1928......................A famous housing scheme of Hyderabad (Sadiq Livina) is named after him.
--ChJameel (talk) 13:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Syed Qamar Zaman Shah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 16:50, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
1) I have written all that I can think about Syed Qamar Zaman Shah for now. Somebody else should write more on this topic.
2) Do you want to assert that the other persons about whom I have created wikipedia pages are not real persons. Is that what you want to assert?
3) Or are you saying Wikipedia should inculde articles about ficitous persons only ?
--ChJameel (talk) 23:18, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
4) I just saw that wiki page about Syed Qamar Zaman Shah and didnot see any seedy deletetion taq. Where is it ?
--ChJameel (talk) 00:33, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- If no more can be written about him, it is probably not worth maintaining. If it can never become more than a stub, we don't need it. I haven't a freaking clue what you're getting at in #2 and 3. And the speedy deletion was declined, so the tag has been removed. It may still come up for AfD, though. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 02:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
[edit] This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 16:58, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
What did I do now ?
--ChJameel (talk) 23:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
If you are talking about article Freedom of speech by country read it again.
--ChJameel (talk) 00:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
It was for adding unsourced content on Freedom of speech. You need to learn to provide sources for the information you submit here. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 02:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 22:28, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Daarya Muaarif Uloom-e-Islamya
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Daarya Muaarif Uloom-e-Islamya, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Non-notable, in the sense that we have only a single website that exposes it. Google searches by the transliteration of the Urdu name reveal nothing; searching by the English name is usurped by the Encyclopedia of Islam.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oli Filth(talk|contribs) 23:05, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Iranian Balouchi's in Hyderabad
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Iranian Balouchi's in Hyderabad, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- I couldn't find anything on the Internet on this topic. The user say that: "But very few written words can be found about these people because of illiteracy." But how does we know it just isn't a hoax?
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. LouriePieterse (talk) 15:34, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
New, nearly incomprehensible stubs
[edit]Hello. While it's clear that English is not your first language, there are still some rules which apply to content and you've had this account long enought to know what they are. Too-short, unsourced and unformatted text is not acceptable. I'm not trying to "bite" you, but please read WP:YFA among others if you wish to contribute original content. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PMDrive1061 (talk • contribs)
- Who wrote that ?? Please sign whatever you write here.
ChJameel (talk) 18:44, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- And you please sign your messages. Drmies (talk) 17:41, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Pir Syed MoinUddin Khamis
[edit]A tag has been placed on Pir Syed MoinUddin Khamis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 03:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Muhammad Ismail Nami
[edit]I have nominated Muhammad Ismail Nami, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Ismail Nami. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drmies (talk) 18:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit] Hello ChJameel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 698 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Syed Qamar Zaman Shah - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Created page Anila Weldon
[edit]Today created a new page for Anila Weldon on 30-07-2012
Speedy deletion nomination of Anila Weldon
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Anila Weldon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 16:54, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
I have not done almost any editing after 2009 so I am not up to speed in Wikipedia.
- It is no different from 2009. Please read the guidelines linked above, in addition to Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Choudry Mohammad Sadiq for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choudry Mohammad Sadiq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.