User talk:Chris G/Archives/2007/December
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Chris G. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Bot Confuson
I'd like to put the status on my userpage, but I cannot get it to work. What am I doing wrong? Alex Holowczak 19:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Chris G Bot 3
My this bot works incredibly slowly. It is still saying that I'm offline. S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s (Talk to Me) 23:47, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Status Bot not updating status
I was wondering why status bot has listed me as "somewhere" for about the past 3 weeks and was wondering if I set something up wrong. --Nn123645 02:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I fixed the problem--Java7837 (talk) 21:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Georgia teens
Chris, thank you for the block of the Georgia teen whatever and for reverting his last attack on my userpage. Much appreciated. He gives teens in general a bad name! (probably was some 40-y/o anyway...) You, on the other hand, are a credit to teens and to WikiAdmins. Cheers, VigilancePrime 09:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Not a problem --Chris 09:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I am the one of the Mandalay Gazette's editor. So that, I have a copyright for that article and also I can use the Mandalaygazette.com web site too. If you have any question about that, please send to me an e.mail at info@mandalaygazette.com I would like to restore my article. thank you. Kyaw Gyi
THANK YOU!
Thank you VERY VERY VERY much for lifting the block, I don't know what in the world happened for me to get blocked... But thanks a lot for your understanding!--Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) 10:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
on my userpage?
Dear Chris,
I have to hand in that it was a great idea to have a status bot. Could you add my userpage to your service list? What do I have to do? Thanks for your reply. --Kushalt 14:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Status Bot
I logged in 30 minutes ago yet status bot still says i am logged out can something be done such as running another copy of this bot at the same time be done--Java7837 (talk) 03:41, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Status Please!
Hello Chris G, I was wondering if you could add a status bot box to my userpage, top right hand corner please! Thank You!--Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) 07:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Ok, Thank You VERY VERY much for the status box!--Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) 11:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Status bot box
Hi. Do you think you could add a status bot box to the top of my userpage. Sorry I'm so lazy. Thanks. ╦ﺇ₥₥€Ԋ(talk/contribs) 17:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
24.7.91.151
Thanks! :) - NeutralHomer T:C 07:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Your bot is a spammer!
Please rein in your horses. 24.255.11.149 (talk) 00:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
BOTs
WHOOPS! Didnt know about that policy! Sorry...--Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) 11:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I will, Thanks!--Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) 11:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Bot 2 character encoding bug
Bot 2 changes Doppelgänger to Doppelgänger. This probably indicates the wrong character encoding; Wikipedia uses UTF-8. NeonMerlin 04:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 50 | 10 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi
Hi, and thank you very much. Littleteddy (talk) 10:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Not a problem. --Chris 10:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Thread moved
Uh, Chris G, You need to reverse the removal of the talk page for kevin kinchen, that you made, the page is in contention, ie, in review and in such reasons for contention are listed on the talk page. menaing, until it is resolved, you arent supposed to remove the discussion or the evidence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.169.112 (talk) 16:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 18:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Bot #1 seems a bit stopped
Hi mate, this bot seems to be a bit stopped, when you get it going anychance of updating every few hours instead of daily? -- maelgwn - talk 08:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- On a similar note, I'm not sure if you refer to User:Chris G Bot as Bot #1 or not, but this bot has stopped updating the Australian noticeboard deletion debates. More regular updates to keep the content fresh would be a good thing. -- Longhair\talk 13:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry TS when down and I forgot to reset my scripts. Both bots should be back up and running. --Chris 00:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Looks good again. Thanks. Are you able to the increase the bots' frequency of updates? -- Longhair\talk 00:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Should be able too, you want it to run on the hour? --Chris 00:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
StatusBot not working for me?
It seems to skip me all the time; I sometimes use a script to change my status to online (as my userpage is coded upon the page). Will (talk) 00:41, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Bot Just not working, please use the script; it will reduce the load on the bot. --Chris 01:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Okay. Thanks. Will (talk) 01:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
I have added your bot thing to my user page. I hope it works!! Gaia Octavia Agrippa (talk) 18:00, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Similar Usernames
What is Wikipedia's policy on similar user names. I have been editing as a registered user since 2004, and I have recently discovered that another user has editing under the username of User:Tommy Boy since 2006. --TommyBoy (talk) 22:31, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- See here, however the users last edit was in November so I don't see a big problem. --Chris 09:31, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for answering my question, I was not entirely sure whether two users having similar usernames is a violation of Wikipedia policy, which according to the information you gave me, it is not. --TommyBoy (talk) 18:51, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
My Name not adding to the list
Ok 2 questions.. 1. Do you have to be on the list of users who have Status bot? If so I have 2 of your templates one on my talk page User talk:WxHalo and the other 2 on my main page. One of the two is my own creation and then there is one at the bottom which is the generic one. Now the Main Page doesn't show up on the list.
Question 2: How can I fix this?
Thanks in advance -WxHalo(T/C) 05:40, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- The reason why the bot is not working for you is that I've restricted it's operation to the first 500 users in Category:Wikipedians who use StatusBot so as to reduce the load on the bot try this script you will be much better off. Also on a side not using templates in your sig is against policy. --Chris 07:12, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Dear Chris G/Archives/2007, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind support on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (72/19/6).
Now that I am a sysop, do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators.
Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. — E talk 12:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
A request for your consideration regarding CAT:AOTR
| Hello fellow Wikipedia administrators open to recall category member! |
|---|
|
I am leaving you this message because recent events have given me concern. When Aaron Brenneman and I, and others, first developed this category well over a year ago, we visualized it as a simple idea. A low hassle, low bureaucracy process. We also visualized it as a process that people would come to trust, in fact as a way of increasing trust in those admins who chose to subscribe to the notion of recall. The very informal approach to who is qualified to recall, what happens during it, and the process in general were all part of that approach. But recent events have suggested that this low structure approach may not be entirely effective. More than one of the recent recalls we have seen have been marred by controversy around what was going to happen, and when. Worse, they were marred by some folk having the perception, rightly or wrongly, that the admin being recalled was trying to change the rules, avoid the process, or in other ways somehow go back on their word. This is bad. It's bad for you the admin, bad for the trust in the process, and bad for the community as a whole. I think a way to address this issue is to increase the predictability of the process in advance. I have tried to do that for myself. In my User:Lar/Accountability page, I have given pretty concrete definitions of the criteria for recall, and of the choices I can make, and of the process for the petition, and of the process for other choices I might make (the modified RfC or the RfAr). I think it would be very helpful if other admins who have voluntarily made themselves subject to recall went to similar detail. It is not necessary to adopt the exact same conditions, steps, criteria, etc. It's just helpful to have SOME. Those are mine, fashion yours as you see fit, I would not be so presumptuous as to say mine are right for you. In fact I urge you not to just adopt mine, as I do change them from time to time without notice, but instead develop your own. You are very welcome to start with mine if you so wish, though. But do something. If you have not already, I urge you to make your process more concrete, now, while there is no pressure and you can think clearly about what you want. Do it now rather than later, during a recall when folk may not react well to perceived changes in process or commitment. Further, I suggest that after you document your process, that you give a reference to it for the benefit of other admins who may want to see what others have done. List it in this table as a resource for the benefit of all. If you use someone else's by reference rather than copy, I suggest you might want to do as Cacharoth did, and give a link to a specific version. Do you have to do these things? Not at all. These are suggestions from me, and me alone, and are entirely up to you to embrace or ignore. I just think that doing this now, thinking now, documenting now, will save you trouble later, if you should for whatever reason happen to be recalled. I apologise if this message seems impersonal, but with over 130 members in the category, leaving a personal message for each of you might not have been feasible, and I feel this is important enough to violate social norms a bit. I hope that's OK. Thanks for your time and consideration, and best wishes. Larry Pieniazek NOTE: You are receiving this message because you are listed in the Wikipedia administrators open to recall category. This is a voluntary category, and you should not be in it if you do not want to be. If you did not list yourself, you may want to review the change records to determine who added you, and ask them why they added you. |
...My guinea pigs and the "A"s having felt this message was OK to go forward with, today it's the turn of the "B"s and "C"s! I'm hoping at least one of you chaps will point to their own criteria instead of mine :)... it's flattering but scary! :) ++Lar: t/c 17:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Chris G Bot 2
I see that Chris G Bot 2 has been disabled. Do you know why this is? If you can't run it, I might be able to do it for you. Soxred93 has a boring sig 18:34, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- No idea why it was disabled so I've enabled it, thanks for notifying me. --Chris 08:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)