Jump to content

User talk:Chrisking1977

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nimuaq (talk) 13:51, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Karl Nerenberg concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Karl Nerenberg, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Karl Nerenberg

[edit]

Hello Chrisking1977. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Karl Nerenberg".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Karl Nerenberg}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Feminine Capital (May 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraphine Gryphon was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 19:26, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeraphine,

I'm new to Wikipedia and this is the first time I've created an entry. You say in your review the article does not adequately show notability. I was wondering if you could be more specific. I'm wondering if I were to provide live links to some of the citations if that would improve notability, or if it is something else. Hope you can help me through this. Thanks very much.

Chrisking1977 (talk) 20:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the current list of references, I see that the authors of the book are also authors of most of the references. That means that those references can't add to the notability of the book. And I'm guessing reference 4, "Small Business Economics", does not actually mention this book, so that ref also can't add to notability. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Chrisking1977, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 19:26, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Karl Nerenberg has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karl Nerenberg. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:29, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Chrisking1977! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 21:15, Monday, May 18, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Chrisking1977! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 21:30, Monday, May 18, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Chrisking1977. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NeilN talk to me 22:00, 18 May 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Chrisking1977. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NeilN talk to me 23:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Nerenberg (June 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Accents was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Accents 18:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Chrisking1977, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Accents 18:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Feminine Capital concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Feminine Capital, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Feminine Capital

[edit]

Hello, Chrisking1977. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Feminine Capital".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 19:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Karl Nerenberg concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Karl Nerenberg, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Karl Nerenberg

[edit]

Hello, Chrisking1977. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Karl Nerenberg".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 23:44, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Chrisking1977, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Chrisking1977! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:31, Wednesday, December 6, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Chrisking1977! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:38, Wednesday, December 6, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Chrisking1977! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:38, Wednesday, December 6, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

AfC notification: Draft:Karl Nerenberg has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karl Nerenberg. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:43, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Karl Nerenberg has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karl Nerenberg. Thanks! NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:57, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Nerenberg has been accepted

[edit]
Karl Nerenberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chrisking1977&oldid=1077868287"