User talk:Chumpy04

Welcome!

Hello, Chumpy04, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Visioncurve^{Timendi causa est nescire} 05:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Waggie. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to William Crooks (locomotive)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Waggie (talk) 06:06, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

William Crooks

If you want to create an article about the American Civil War colonel - instead of overwriting the disambiguation list - click the redlink of his name here: William Crooks - add the information to this new page to create a new article, and add a link to it on the disambiguation page - the new article should also have references added to verify the information. - EdwardUK (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thank you! Chumpy04 (talk) 02:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So do I go to “Article Wizard” and then make a draft? Chumpy04 (talk) 02:47, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can use the Article Wizard or the "submit your draft" link in your sandbox, but Article Wizard is useful for new editors as it gives information on how to improve the article. When you have finished working on a sandbox/draft version and submitted it, it will go through the "Articles for creation" process where a reviewer will either accept the article or suggest improvements (which can sometimes take a several weeks, but from my experience takes less time if the draft is well sourced and correctly formatted). What you have in your sandbox looks good, but there are a few things I can suggest before you submit it.

Footnotes are needed – references should be placed next to the information they relate to – see Help:Footnotes, and using a citation template such as {{cite web}} gives more details, for example: <ref name=MLRL>{{cite web|url=https://www.leg.state.mn.us/legdb/fulldetail?id=11709|title=Crooks, William "Wm."|website=Minnesota Legislative Reference Library|accessdate=June 27, 2020}}</ref>
Categories are needed – these can be listed at the end, for example [[:Category:Union Army colonels]]. Have a look at articles on similar people to get ideas for which categories could be added.
More wikilinks would be helpful - such as to the railroad companies and to the Dakota War of 1862 article. EdwardUK (talk) 23:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ramsay Crooks

Hi, thank you for expanding the biography of Ramsay Crooks! Ideally, an article like this should have footnotes throughout. I'll do my best to work some footnotes into this the next few days. Pete Forsyth (talk) 17:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Chumpy04 (talk) 02:43, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Crooks (colonel) has been accepted

William Crooks (colonel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kyle Forgeard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyle Forgeard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Forgeard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 19:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Dad Hard Seltzer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Happy Dad Hard Seltzer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 14:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello Chumpy04. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Chumpy04. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Chumpy04|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. BEACHIDICAE🌊 14:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being paid to edit this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chumpy04 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is your connection to the subjects which you are writing about? BEACHIDICAE🌊 14:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t have a connection other than I am a fan of their work. I simply want to promote their new product without being paid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chumpy04 (talk • contribs) 18:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, Wikipedia isn't for promotion, regardless of whether you're getting paid or not. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 23:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI I have been involved in Nelk’s Wikipedia page for a while now and I also created Kyle Forgeard’s page about a month ago. They are the founders of this new seltzer and it will be very big very soon. I am also in the process of submitting my article so it can get approved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chumpy04 (talk • contribs) 23:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Happy Dad Hard Seltzer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Happy Dad Hard Seltzer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 23:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Happy Dad Hard Seltzer Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Happy Dad Hard Seltzer Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Forgeard moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kyle Forgeard, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 20:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Paddy Pimblett

Hi Pls read the comment section on the draft page prior submit the draft for review. subject needs to have at least 3 fights in UFC to pass NMMA notability guidelines which at the moment he has only 2. I will move the page to main space when he has fought his third fight in UFC. Cassiopeia talk 00:44, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyle Forgeard (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyle Forgeard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kyle Forgeard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 19:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kyle Forgeard

Hello, Chumpy04. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kyle Forgeard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 19:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Birth dates

Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted a change you made to Michele Tafoya. In this edit, you added a birth date, but you didn't cite a reliable source. Wikipedia has strict rules on content in biographies of living persons because this can impact real peoples' lives. Please be aware that many sites on the internet purport to give information about celebrities, but few of them of reliable. Sites like the IMDb use user-generated content, and they should not be cited in biographical articles. Similarly, celebrity gossip websites should not be used because most of them don't have a history of fact checking or publishing corrections. Fan sites and blogs are self-published and have no editorial control. We also can't use primary documents, such as government birth databases or genealogical websites (which are also typically user-generated, as above). This means that the number of available sources is quite slim, and we often have to either go without this information or wait until a source like Entertainment Weekly or the BBC publishes an interview that includes a birth date. If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, you can ask at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Joshua Dobbs, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.

In addition, please don't mark edits as being minor when they change the meaning of the article. Read Help:Minor_edit for more information. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]