User talk:Citizen6ix
In the format that you are putting up that article it looks like you are spamming. Take a look at how other magazine articles are and work from that. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:27, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
The article Metamusic has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 03:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
October 2011
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eton College, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Asshole (song) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 22:03, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Real life. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}
" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Real life was changed by Citizen6ix (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927227 on 2011-12-17T22:05:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:05, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
December 2018
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jacob Rees-Mogg has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jacob Rees-Mogg was changed by Citizen6ix (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96291 on 2018-12-14T23:03:30+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
January 2019
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Doug Weller talk 11:35, 8 January 2019 (UTC)