User talk:Clbass1
|
Image copyright problem with Image:Cavaliers_-_Bassque_2006.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Cavaliers_-_Bassque_2006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Optimization
[edit]Wikipedia is not for helping you pass your Search Engine Optimization class. Your neologism has been removed. Don't try that again or you'll have to explain to your prof why you got blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. DS 14:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Heh. I read both versions of your message on my talk page; the politer version usually gets better results.
- That said, no. There is no way to rewrite the article in such a way that it would not be spam, especially not while the contest is still going. DS 16:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The file File:Goldsmith2sm.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 November 2019 (UTC)