Jump to content

User talk:ConnectedEquality

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please check out infobox of that article & look at the articles Minnesota, Mark Dayton & List of lieutenant governors of Minnesota for examples. She is the 49th Lieutenant Governor of Minnesota. Fischbach may consider herself acting lieutenant governor but that's irrelevant under the state Constitution, which says that she is lieutenant governor. GoodDay (talk) 23:44, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop immediately your vandalism on the article or you will be blocked. WhatsUpWorld (talk) 04:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Lieutenant Governor Michelle Fischbach.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lieutenant Governor Michelle Fischbach.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:57, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Senate special election in Minnesota, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Speaker of the House of Representatives (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for your work adding electoral history sections to various pages! Marquardtika (talk) 19:19, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm FenixFeather. I noticed that you recently removed content from Killing of Mollie Tibbetts without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – FenixFeather (talk)(Contribs) 23:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 00:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ConnectedEquality (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, I believe I was blocked because I used the same IP address for multiple accounts. Although I admit it was my responsibility to know the rules ahead of time, I was not aware it was against the rules to have more than one account. I apologize for breaking the rules and pledge to adhere to them strictly moving forward, particularly because I really enjoy editing on Wikipedia and believe that I have made a good number of helpful contributions to the community. I did not intentionally use any of the accounts for nefarious purposes, nor did I intentionally mislead anybody in making those edits. I am acting in good faith and I believe, if given the opportunity to have my username and/or IP address unblocked, I would continue to make helpful contributions to the website and contribute positively to the internet and wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration and attention.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time as this is a sockpuppetry and/or checkuser block. Check users have access to technical and personally identifying information they may not disclose openly on Wikipedia. Please read and heed the relevant sections of the WP:GAB. If this is not your original account, you will need to appeal at your original account. -- Deepfriedokra 16:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.