User talk:Corydor13

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Carlton Cole, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Carlton Cole was changed by Corydor13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930642 on 2010-12-16T10:33:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:33, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mac OS. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mac OS was changed by Corydor13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.898738 on 2010-12-17T09:54:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Emo, you may be blocked from editing. SabreBD (talk) 10:13, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Luke dallison

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cucumberland County, Vagina

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Cucumberland County, Vagina, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:36, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Reynolds Corner, Virginia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:36, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jon Hayes

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Malleus Fatuorum 14:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 14:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JohnCD - Excuse me, i have noticed that my account has been blocked, i have no idea why this has happened as this is the first time i have logged in in around 4-5 days, i fear that maybe my account has been hacked by someone?...I'm sorry for the edit's from my profile, by it was not me, is there anything i can do to get my account working properly again? :-(

So, erm, you haven't logged in for 4-5 days, yet you just happen to have logged in at exactly the time you were blocked? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS: You do realize, don't you, that it would be easy for a CheckUser to check the IP addresses used for both your message here and the vandalism edits? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i'm 17 years old and i go to an IT college and i think that one of my classmates must have got into my account, as i'm the only one in the class with a wikipedia account, and i realised they were messing around with my account as i looked at the person next to me's computer screen, so i came on here to see what they were doing and i had this message from "JohnCD" saying that my account had been blocked indefinitely, i hope you will understand the situation that i'm in, i'm not immature enough for this, and if you reactivate my account, i will change my password, i promise that nothing like this will happen again.

The problem is, even assuming good faith on your part, how can we tell this is really you now and not still your classmates? The truth is we can't, so I don't think there's any real option but for you to abandon this account and start again. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you unblock my account, and give me one more chance, i promise you, this will NOT happen again, i will change my password...Please, just one more chance. You will get no trouble from this account again.

No. We do not unblock compromised accounts - see WP:GOTHACKED and WP:My little brother did it. For one thing, we have no way to be sure that the person requesting the unblock is not the same person who made edits like this and this. JohnCD (talk) 15:43, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

well what is the point in having the appeal process if you DO NOT unblock accounts, and thanks, another username that i am going to have to remember when i create my new account tonight ... You've been lots of help -_-

We do unblock accounts in some circumstances. But in this case we cannot, because we cannot possibly know it's you. Answer this question yourself - how can we really know it's really you and not still your classmates jerking us about? They could make all the same promises you can. If you create a new account, you might care to have a look at Template:User committed identity to learn one way of recovering your account after it has been hacked. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:08, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bunch of douche bags.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

stop being such a stupid bunch of cunts ffs, im not here to vandalize this website but what you're doing is just fucking ridiculous. bunch of pricks...

As you are using this talk page only for abuse, I have revoked your talk page access. You can still request unblock by email to unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org, but a compromised account like this is not likely to be unblocked. JohnCD (talk) 12:43, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]