Jump to content

User talk:CostalCal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 days ago by Hapless Hagfish in topic Question from Hapless Hagfish (19:37, 3 September 2026)

Note

[edit]

Talk Page Archive

[edit]

Nomination of Hertz Dias for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hertz Dias, which you previously marked as reviewed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hertz Dias until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion. SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 17:44, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add {{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.

AfC backlog drive

[edit]

Hi @CostalCal, and thank you for signing up to the August Articles for Creation Backlog Drive! Please be sure to re-request access to the AFC Helper script in order to participate. Happy editing! In solidarity, nil nz 04:34, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

In re Draft:Angustias Garcia Uson

[edit]

The disclosure is on their user page friend. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:43, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Got it. However, there was no mention on the mainspace comments or talk page so I didn’t know. CostalCal (talk) 19:46, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
That's not required. User page is sufficient. Be sure to check all three (I'm terrible at checking the talk page, so I make this mistake too sometimes). Do you mind resubmitting the article so it can be reviewed again? I think the editor is making good faith efforts to comply. Cheers. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:49, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Resubmitted. CostalCal (talk) 20:05, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I should also say as a note. If you ever think a WP:COI is going to be a problem in an article, you can always copy that COI notice to the article's talk page too, if it's just on the author's user page. You can also just post it as an AfC comment. As an example, I do this a lot for paid editors trying to create NPOV problematic business articles. Sulfurboy (talk) 20:11, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Got it. CostalCal (talk) 20:48, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

AfC acceptance of Thommas Kane Byrne

[edit]

Hi CostalCal. I was doing some cleanup on this article and I noticed that every single citation is broken, linking to base domains rather than to the appropriate websites, making verification difficult. Wondering if you noticed this? Cheers. BrechtBro (talk) 04:36, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Just fixed it. CostalCal (talk) 14:52, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Can you explain reversion? This undid a significant amount of cleanup I performed and also put the works into the incorrect MOS:LISTORDER. Thanks. BrechtBro (talk) 17:06, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@CostalCal Another editor had already repaired most of the links when you executed the revert, and I had repaired one of them. I'd appreciate it if you would reconcile the changes that you apparently unintentionally reverted. BrechtBro (talk) 00:29, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I thought that the references would have been fixed. However, that is my fault for not checking. CostalCal (talk) 00:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sure. When executing a revert, its your responsibility to ensure that intervening helpful edits are not also reverted. BrechtBro (talk) 01:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 2 August 2026

[edit]
  • On the bright side: The beautiful game
    2026 Men's FIFA World Cup, Wikimania music, and wikipress.
  • Traffic report: Odyssey and Oyarzabal
    To take you in the sun to (Ithaca), to show you the World Cup, it's the time of the season for editing!

CS1 error on Thommas Kane Byrne

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Thommas Kane Byrne, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use placeholder names, or the name of the newspaper or organisation, instead of the source's actual author or editor name. If no human author is given, the fields should be removed. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
    • news, Website. "Website news". www.larkincommunitycollege.ie. Retrieved 2026-07-31. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:06, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wolf Den Run State Park (August 3)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Wolf Den Run State Park to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Sulfurboy (talk) 00:17, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Zachary's Chicago Pizza moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Zachary's Chicago Pizza. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster talk 02:07, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Discospinster I tagged the mainspace page for deletion as another user copy-and-pasted the page from the draft. CostalCal (talk) 02:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Listing for discussion of Template:Wildfires in the United States/2024–present

[edit]

icon Template:Wildfires in the United States/2024–present has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 1915 Mullinville tornado for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1915 Mullinville tornado, which you previously marked as reviewed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1915 Mullinville tornado until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion. SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 13:29, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add {{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.

AfC August Backlog Drive: Only ten days left!

[edit]
Our pending drafts!

Hi CostalCal, thanks for participating in the Articles for Creation August Backlog Drive! We've done amazing work so far, dropping the backlog by more than 3000 drafts already. We have around 1300 drafts outstanding, and we need your help to get that down to zero in the next 10 days. We can do this, but we need all hands on deck to help make it happen – if everyone who signed up to the drive reviewed just 1–2 drafts a day for the next ten days, we'd be down to zero in no time! A list of the pending drafts can be found at WP:AFCSORT, where you can select submissions in your area of interest, or you can find a random submission here. Thank you so much for your work so far, and happy reviewing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 August 2026

[edit]
  • On the bright side: The great outdoors
    Blue Angels, Indigenous Peoples' Day, and the Perseids meteor shower.
  • Opinion: Are we embarrassed yet?
    One editor wants to find out more about a Department of Justice investigation of Wikipedia and its editors.
  • Comix: WP:FAOWN
    "Explaining civilly" probably should go both ways...

Submitting of Draft:Alice (South Korean singer)

[edit]

Hi @CostalCal. I have submitted the draft of Alice (former member of Hello Venus), in which I have proved with reliable sources that she is separately notable from her former group due to her solo debut with the single "Twenty-something" and her solo acting roles. I'd like you to take a look at it if you can. Thank you! Techgamer534 (talk) 11:07, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft is article now. CostalCal (talk) 23:40, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol September 2026 Backlog drive

[edit]
September 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2026, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin at a particularly important time for NPP.
  • The backlog has now passed 30,000 unreviewed articles, a level that has been described in current NPP discussions as exceptionally high and potentially difficult to overcome through normal reviewing alone. Backlog drives are one of the few measures that have historically produced a noticeable reduction in the backlog, so the participation of as many active patrollers as possible will matter this month.
  • If you can review during September, please make articles your priority. Every article that is reviewed is a meaningful reduction in the backlog. With the queue at its current size, even a relatively small increase in the number of articles each patroller reviews can add up to a substantial difference over the course of the month.
  • This is a hybrid drive, so redirect reviewing is still included. Redirects can be a useful way for newer patrollers to get comfortable with NPP and can help people build up to reviewing articles. However, the main goal of this drive is to tackle the article backlog, and experienced patrollers are particularly encouraged to spend as much of their available reviewing time on articles as they can.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • If you have been thinking about doing more NPP, this is an especially good month to jump in. Whether you can review a few pages or hundreds, every review helps. And if you are already an active patroller, please consider whether you can put in some additional time during September to help bring the backlog back under control.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Request to review a draft

[edit]

Hey @CostalCal, I wanted to reach out to see if you could also review the draft, Draft:Arunachal church burnings, 1968–1978. I feel this would be an important and notable topic for wikipedia, especially since this event led to the formulation of the Arunachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act. Also would appreciate if you could take a look at Draft:Christian persecution in Manipur

Best, Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 00:28, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Flyingphoenixchips I'll take a look. CostalCal (talk) 00:31, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks appreciate it Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 01:05, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2026 Toyota GR Cup North America for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 Toyota GR Cup North America, which you previously marked as reviewed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Toyota GR Cup North America until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion. SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 16:59, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add {{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.

Nomination of Destruction of the Rafi'-Nia synagogue for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Destruction of the Rafi'-Nia synagogue, which you previously marked as reviewed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destruction of the Rafi'-Nia synagogue until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion. SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 02:51, 28 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add {{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.

Nomination of Konstantinos Vasileiou for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Konstantinos Vasileiou, which you previously marked as reviewed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konstantinos Vasileiou (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion. SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 02:46, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add {{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.

Nomination of Matan Schwartz for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matan Schwartz, which you previously marked as reviewed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matan Schwartz until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion. SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 05:16, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add {{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.

Review

[edit]

Hello CostalCal

Would it be easy for you to review my pages? I remember that you did review some of them in the past, thats why im taking the time to ask. Thank you! Agpigeon (talk) 12:15, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Agpigeon I currently don't have NPR rights anymore. I'm going to attempt to ask for it back though for a September drive coming up. CostalCal (talk) 16:54, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, didn't know that. I saw messages where people asked you to review articles, but now i realized these are drafts waiting to be reviewed. I got a few if you want to review Agpigeon (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Alright. CostalCal (talk) 17:21, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rommel offensive for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rommel offensive, which you previously marked as reviewed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rommel offensive until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion. SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 05:10, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add {{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.

Question from Hapless Hagfish (19:37, 3 September 2026)

[edit]

Could you please look at my edits on Knytt's page? I added a lot of new material and sources to back it up, and I want to know if there's anything I could improve on. Also, do you think I added enough new sources to remove the "this article needs more sources for verification" banner? --Hapless Hagfish (talk) 19:37, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Looked at it. Fixed. CostalCal (talk) 23:14, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Hapless Hagfish (talk) 00:27, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply