User talk:Courtneyeastman

November 2013

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Kevin Eastman because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Eastman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kevin Eastman was changed by Courtneyeastman (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966065 on 2013-11-04T10:56:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:56, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Eastman, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 11:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Eastman with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 11:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you are related to the subject of the article, see WP:Biographies of living persons/Help for advice. JohnCD (talk) 11:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]