User talk:Courtneyseesghosts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Courtneyseesghosts! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 17:04, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Peaceray (talk) 17:04, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Critics praised X, Y, and Z[edit]

Please don't add your own Rotten Tomatoes-style critical consensus. We already have Rotten Tomatoes itself for this. If you want to cite what Rotten Tomatoes said, you can do that. Otherwise, you run into issues of synthesis and cherry-picking. If there's actually a consensus, Rotten Tomatoes will report it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Star Trek (film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:22, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Black Panther: Wakanda Forever, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 11:46, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Looper (film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:03, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop marking all of your edits as minor[edit]

"Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Read Help:Minor edit for more information. Sundayclose (talk) 18:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Birds of Prey (2020 film), you may be blocked from editing. Please see MOS:FILMCRITICS, which says "The overall critical reception to a film should be supported by attributions to reliable sources that summarize reviews; do not synthesize individual reviews." NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 00:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Serenity (2005 film), you may be blocked from editing. You've been warned about inserting original research several times in the past, but don't appear to be taking the warnings to heart. Please stop. DonIago (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]