User talk:Crna Gora~enwiki/Archive2

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

Bla

Are you Serbian Orthodox? Do you see yourself as a Serb from Montenegro or simply a montenegrin? nexm0d //just asking...

He doesn't consider himself a Serb. He's pro-independence, and that makes him a Montenegrin and probably a follower of the Montenegrin Orthodox Church... but hey, I'm guessing here :) --Manwe 20:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted lyrics

In your edit to Sean Paul - We Be Burnin', you wrote:

Lyrics provided by User:CrnaGora. These lyrics are copyrighted and are allowed to be released into public domain.

That's not normally the case with copyrighted works, particularly in the case of commercially released songs. Without proof that the copyright holder has either explicitly released this work into the public domain or licenced it under the GFDL, I'm just going to have to assume that copying these lyrics is against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Absent that proof, could you please desist from copying entire copyrighted works into articles? -- The Anome 02:34, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have replaced the lyrics again, this time with a request that they not be removed. Please don't do that; can you please read the copyright policy again before adding lyrics to any article? -- The Anome 02:38, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted the lyrics... we don't necessarily have permission to copy them even if they're displayed on the singer's website. Also, the song should not be titled "Sean Paul - We Be Burnin'", this isn't in accordance with Wikipedia naming standards. "Sean Paul" isn't part of the song's title. -- Curps 02:58, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CrnaGora; I see that you have stated:

Lyrics provided by User:CrnaGora. These lyrics are copyrighted and are allowed to be released into public domain. The lyrics are also available on Sean Paul's official site and that would be proof that they are copyrighted work relesed into public domain.

That is not evidence of release into the public domain; allowing you to make viewing copies (which copyright holders can do at their sole discretion) is not the same thing as granting you a licence to make further copies. Please read the articles on copyright, contract law, and licence for more information on how copyright works; and please read public domain as well -- the term has a special meaning in copyright law that is different from just "available to the public". -- Karada 03:29, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote on We Be Burnin': "Lyrics provided by User:CrnaGora. These lyrics are copyrighted and are allowed to be released into public domain. The lyrics are also available on Sean Paul's official site. I asked the copyright holder if I can have the lyrics for We Be Burnin' and if I can post the lyrics on Wikipedia and he said I can under one condition, nobody edit the lyrics for the song since I told him that in Wikipedia, articles can be edited." I have a very hard time believing this, as most song lyrics are copyrighted and all text contributions on Wikipedia (apart from very small extracts of copyrighted works) must be licensed under the GFDL. If the person who spoke with you said that the lyrics could only be used on Wikipedia, then this is not compliant with Wikipedia's aim to create a "free" encyclopedia that anybody can distribute. Anyway, I merged the We Be Burnin' page to The Trinity (album) as both articles were stubs. Extraordinary Machine 00:31, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Watson

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Emma Watson, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 23:19, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. Unfortunately, it looks like you haven't yet read WP:CITE. Please do so. You really do have to cite your information. --Yamla 17:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

Hi there, I would like to point out to you that most users who participate in the RfA process tend to perfer active contributors with a greater amount of edits and Wikipedia project particiaption. Your contributions are insufficient for people to draw any conclusions about you and your ability with respect to the project (see other users' standards here, what RfA contributors look for, and your edit review). I do recommend you withdraw your request for now, and become an active Wikipedia participant for a few months before trying for a future RfA. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. — TheKMan^talk 00:39, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Peaces01.gif

An image that you uploaded, Image:Peaces01.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Also, you have a large amount of copyrighted material on your userpage. Lyrics and images such as yours may not be used on user pages. This includes all of the images at User:CrnaGora/Simpsons Gallery and User:CrnaGora/images, and the lyrics at User:CrnaGora/Lyrics. Copyrighted works cannot be claimed as fair use on userpages, and only the original authors can release copyrighted material into the public domain. Please remove the images and lyrics immediately! ~MDD 46 96 03:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Neighborhoods of Queens

If you have some knowledge that New Howard Beach, Parkside, Rockaway Point, Utopia, and/or Westmoreland can be considered neighborhoods of Queens, please reply on Talk:List of Queens neighborhoods. patsw 00:04, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Dino Merlin.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dino Merlin.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 22:20, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Hello! It's nice to meet someone from a neighbouring country that has different political affilation than it is "propaganded" in here.

I see that you are for full independence of the Republic of Montenegro. While I understant that affilation, I do not understand why do you support all the other countries on the world that desire independence.

Could you give me a brief summary? Thanks! --HolyRomanEmperor 16:20, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I draw descendency from Boka Kotorska and the Hills;

al' sam rođen u Karlovcu, Karlovac Općina, Hrvatska Socijalistička Republika, Socijalistička Federativna Republika Jugoslavija.

Ispalo je kao da sam bio ljut. :) Nisam, samo me je interesiralo.

Uzgred, ja sam stručnjak za povijest Crne Gore (donekle). Vidi moj članak: Duklja. --HolyRomanEmperor 20:42, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May I know from which Montenegrin clan are you? (if you are from one) --HolyRomanEmperor 23:53, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hello. Of course i didnt awarded myself.It was given to me by Expatkiwi.

-Inanna-

A site

I know that you probably might not like this site because of its design, but contains quitte a lot on Montenegro's history and is a Njegoš production: Monte Negro --HolyRomanEmperor 00:15, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assyrian Independence

What do you think of eventual independence for Assyrians. I know it's along shot even for the Kurds to go that way, but you seem to support other independence movements.

Plav-Gusinje

Ne razumem zašto si članke o Plavu i Gusinju spojio u jedan. Zašto ne bi postojala tri članka: "Plav-Gusinje", "Plav" i "Gusinje"? Ipak su to sve različiti pojmovi. PANONIAN (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Western Sahara-related vote

===>Here Make your voice heard. Vote or die. And all that. -Justin (koavf), talk 20:34, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of Zeta

Greetings. First, let me congratulate on a well-done job on Zeta. But secondly, are you sure that Zeta was a Kingdom? I mean, I know that the Nemanjics were Kings of Zeta, but Zeta was actually a constitutional principality. And as for the Balšićs and Crnojevićs, I can't really remember that one of them was a King. Wasn't Nikola I Petrović Njegoš the first King? --HolyRomanEmperor 13:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crnogorski referendum

Pa nemam mišljenje da li Crna Gora treba da bude nezavisna ili ne, šta god odluči većina građana Crne Gore, tako treba da bude. Jedino mislim da referendumska pravila koja je predložila EU nisu pravedna i da diskriminišu građane koji su za nezavisnost. Što se tiče glasanja o članku, nije mi baš jasno o čemu se tu glasa. Šta je to "Collaboration of the Week"? PANONIAN (talk) 14:12, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Montenegrin independence

Out of various reasons, I think that Montenegro and Serbia should be two seperate (independent from each other) states. However, I strongly agree that economical and other union must be kept between the two states for easier common entrance into the European Union (one currency (Euro, perhaps, if not any other?), free right-of-passage). It would, AFAIC create a close union between the two states than it is now - but in reality, both states would finally be independent; an alternative that I find amazing.

Now, how about that Kingdom of Zeta issue? :) --HolyRomanEmperor 21:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Runescape

You asked me in my talk page a few weeks ago if i play runescape. I do, drop me a line in game some time if you want, my runescape name is Curran919. Curran919 08:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Odgovor

Da, ja sam pravio te mape. Napravio sam ih u Photoshop programu. Jednostavno uzmem neku mapu koju je neko drugi uradio, onda je u Photoshopu isečem, povećam, umanjim, obojim, itd, i dobijem potpuno novu mapu. Ništa komplikovano, samo treba malo truda i mnogo slobodnog vremena. I ranije sam crtao mape, ali sada ih crtam zato što se sa Vikipedije brišu slike čiji copyright status nije jasan, pa samo ovakve mape koje nacrtam mogu da stavim na Vikipediju. Inače, primetio sam da si dve moje mape prepravio, pa bih te zamolio da to ubuduće ne činiš. Ako misliš da na nekoj od mojih mapa nešto treba popraviti, slobodno mi to reci, i ja ću to popraviti. Inače, već su mi predlagali da budem administrator ovde, ali sam odbio, pa ću i sada. Mislim da nemam vremena da radim administratorski posao. Već sam administrator na srpskoj Vikipediji, a ne stižem da se bavim ovim poslom ni tamo, a i mrzi me da se bakćem sada oko procedure da se postane administrator. U svakom slučaju, hvala na ponudi. PANONIAN (talk) 01:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Possible Future Administrator

Thank you very much for your offer, User:CrnaGora. I wish to note to you that I already had an unsuccessful nomination some time ago, but the main problems (lack of edit summaries, namespace sections) where dealt with and that was a while ago. I have over 4,000 edits, so I think that I have also fulfilled that necessity. But that's not on me to decide - the voters will; and, based on numerious facts, judge whether I am valid or invalid for an administrator.

In short notice, I gladly accept your nomination.

P. S.

You're doing fine yourself. You have now around 1,000 edits; and if you keep it up for just a while longer - you could be an administrator too.

Regards. --HolyRomanEmperor 19:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have fullfilled your nomination, CrnaGora.

Thank you again for the nomination. --HolyRomanEmperor 15:40, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have enough Project edits (barely 50), so I am dropping it. Next time perhaps. Thanks anyway, mate! --HolyRomanEmperor 12:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rfa vandalism

I see what you did on the RfA page. It's unacceptable to vote twice with two different user names (CrnaGora and Ottoman Sultan). Please stop disrupting the administration process.

Also, stop tellign people misleading information: There IS NOT 3000 EDIT LIMIT TO BECOMING AN ADMIN!. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 21:07, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Miomog.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Miomog.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 15:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Adminship

Well, like I said; I'm going to work on the project edits a little more; then someone might nominate me, and I might pass.

You may see your edits here. I didn't pass because of too low edits; so don't you think that you should amass more edits too?

Anyway, I think that the best name would be Medieval Realm of Zeta --HolyRomanEmperor 20:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AID

Hi CrnaGora, i saw you on WP:AID. I guess you want to support Homes Sim. but you add your sign to removed votes part. I put it to support votes part. Btw it's better to use your sign with subst: {{subst:User:CrnaGora/Signature}} i corrected them too. Cheers --Ugur Basak 22:00, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Makemi RfA

File:Stick insect02.jpg

Thank you for voting on my RfA. It passed with a consensus to promote of 45/7/1. To those of you concerned about the fact that I am a relative newcomer, I encourage you to poke me with a sharp stick if I make a mistake. Or better yet, let me know on my talk page, and I'll do my best to fix it. Mak emi 04:50, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for your support on my request for adminship. It did not succeed, however, with votes of 10/19/11, so I have not yet become an administrator. I appreciate your support vote, though, and I look forward to see you vote for me next time! Should you have any questions, comments, or complaints at any point in the future, please do not hesitate to let me know on my talk page or via e-mail.

—JP06035

Do NOT cut and paste articles and do unilateral moves. If you want to move something, call a vote on your proposal. Never cut and paste things. That destroys the edit history. If you do it again you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 19:41, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you so much for supporting me in my recent RfA, which passed with a final tally of 56/1/0. I thank you for your confidence in my abilities. If you ever need anything or find that I have made an error, please let me know on my talk page. — Scm83x ^{hook 'em} 21:14, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Football AID 26 March - 1 April

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

Football in Germany has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Homer Simpson wins!

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Homer Simpson was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Joyous | Talk 18:37, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

My RfA recently closed and it was a success, passing at 84-02-00. I would like to thank you for taking the time to weigh in and on your subsequent support. And I know it's quite cliche, but if you ever need any assistance and/or want another opinion on something, grab a Pepsi and don't hesitate to drop me a line on my talk page. Thanks again. Pepsidrinka 05:06, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Crna Gora~enwiki/Archive2, thank you you so much for supporting my RfA, which passed successfully 49/6/3. I am grateful for all the supportive comments, and have taken people's suggestions to heart. I will do my best to live up to people's expectations. If I can ever make any improvements or help out in any way, please feel free to let me know! Thanks again for your much appreciated support.

¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 05:48, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

	My RfA
	Thank you for supporting/opposing/commenting on my request of adminship, sadly the result was 54/20/7 an thus only 73% support votes, resulting in that the nomination failed. As many of you commenting that I have to few main-space edits, I'll try to better my self on that part. If you have any ideas on what kind of articles I could edit, pleas send me a line. :)	_→AzaToth 09:33, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

US Collaboration of the month

You have voted for Omaha, Nebraska on the USCOTM. It was selected to be this months's collaboration. You are invited to help to contribute in order to improve Omaha, Nebraska in any way possible.

COTW Project

You voted for History of the World Wide Web, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. PDXblazers 19:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration of the Week

File:Star Wars Tie-Fighter-Vaders.jpg

You showed support for the Star Wars Collaboration of the week.
This week The Jedi Academy trilogy was selected to be improved to featured article status. We hope you can contribute.

DaGizza's RfA

Hi Crna Gora~enwiki/Archive2, thank you for supporting me in my RfA which passed with a tally of (93/1/2). If you need any help or wish discuss something with me, you are always welcome to talk to me. Gizza^Chat ^© 11:47, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cinema Collaboration of the Week

You may or may not have known this, but I feel that Thefourdotelipsis removed the backlog tag I had placed on the nomination page. You came after that, and removed all "expired" nominations to the "/Removed" sub-page. Would it be possible to resubmit an article that had been moved there because it "expired?" The articles sat there for a long period of time, and the deadlines came and went. Could you please explain your actions? Thanks — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 03:55, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Results and Thanks

Crna Gora~enwiki/Archive2, thank you for supporting me in my recent RfA. Although it did not succeed as no consensus was declared (final: 65/29/7), I know that there is always an opportunity to request adminship again. If and when that day comes, I hope you will once again support me. If at any time I make any mistakes or if you would like to comment on my contributions to Wikipedia, you are more than welcome to do so. Regardless of your religious, cultural, and personal beliefs, I pray that whatever and whoever motivates you in life continues to guide you on the most righteous path.

--- joturner 12:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SCOTW

File:Chemistry-stub.png

You voted for Orion Nebula and this article is now the current Science Collaboration of the Week!
Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia science article.

--D e ryc k C. 05:55, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My (HereToHelp’s) RfA

Thank you for supporting my RfA. I’m proud to inform you that it passed with 75 support to 1 oppose to 2 neutral. I promise to make some great edits in the future (with edit summaries!) and use these powers to do all that I can to help. After all, that’s what I’m here for! (You didn’t think I could send a thank you note without a bad joke, could I?) --Here T oHelp 12:18, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Football AID 2 April - 8 April

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

Timeline of football (soccer) has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Adminship

You have 783 article edits. As soon as you amass say 1,000-2,000, just notify me and I will nominate you for an admin. If you want, I could nominate you right now, but I can't guarrantee that you will receive all Supports before you reach 1,000 article edits.

I myself have fullfilled the requirements that I lacked before (and I've got over 4,300 edits), so could you please nominate me now? Thanks in advance, Slavic mate! --HolyRomanEmperor 13:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the link: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/HolyRomanEmperor3. --HolyRomanEmperor 13:07, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hello CrnaGora, how are you? Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (88/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Glad to hear you like the House of Gryffindor. I am very humbled by your vote and grateful. Please let me know if at any stage you require assistance, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an administrator. Good luck on your referendum. Once again thank you and with kind regards from the House of Gryffindor 17:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history Collaboration of the Fortnight

You supported American Revolutionary War, which has been selected as the Military history WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Fortnight. Please help improve this article to featured article standards. Kirill Lok s h in 23:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for suporting Compasso d'Oro

thank you for suporting Compasso d'Oro Juan Scott 04:48, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have a barnstar

I noticed that no one awarded you a barnstars so far, so, here; have one:

I awarded CrnaGora this barnstar, for his countless contributions tothis wikipedia

P. S. If you didn't know, barnstars are awarded to users that really excell at something. Cheers! --HolyRomanEmperor 18:02, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Improvement Belgrade

You may wish to vote for Belgrade at the Article Improvement Drive page, here. --estavisti 22:19, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Montenegrin language

Puting aside the fact that there is no standard for Montenegrin language as no official body has yet published grammar, vocabulary or anything simmilar, you cannot change things to your liking. If you really believe that there was such a thing as original Montenegrin alphabet (not to mention that Montenegro was forced to join Serbia) you should cite your sources.--RockyMM 12:46, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Latin America won!

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Latin America was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Joyous | Talk 19:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

United States Collaboration of the Week

You voted for Denver, Colorado as US Collaboration of the Week. Please help improve it to Featured Article Status.PDXblazers 01:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COTW Project

You voted for Demographics of Europe, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. --Avala 20:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nezavisna...

Ćao! Hteo bih nešto da te pitam, ne pokušavam da te uvredim, ali sam znatiželjan. Zašto želiš da se Crna Gora odvoji od državne zajednice? Zar ne možemo svi živeti zajedno? Znam da je Crna Gora i ranije imala svoju državu i bila je nezavisna, ali odnosi između Srbije i Crne Gore su oduvek bili dobri. Hajde, razumem to što su se odvojili Slovenci, Hrvati i Bosanci, pa i razumem zašto Kosovo želi da se odvoji. Ali Crnogorci kao narod su oduvek bili privrženi Srbima, i obrnuto. Srbija se nikad nije borila protiv Crne Gore i Crna Gora se nikad nije borila protiv Srbije. Ono što ja vidim ovih dana je svesna mržnja između Srba i Crnogoraca, što me duboko brine. Zar je moguće da više volite Albance, koji su izjavili da će podržati nezavisnu Crnu Goru, nego braću Srbe? Zašto nezavisnost? Jesu li Srbi ikada "etnički čistili" Crnogorce ili obrnuto? Zar smo ikada počinili nešto strašno što bi vas nateralo da nas mrzite? Ne mogu da shvatim to što podržavate plaćenike kao što su Milo i Filip, postavljeni na pozicije kako bi raskomadali Balkan. Zar ne bi bilo pametnije ostati ujedinjeni i zajedno ući u Evropu? Ja iskreno ne vidim svrhu ovog referenduma u maju, meni to zvuči isto toliko besmisleno kao kad bi Vojvodina htela da se odvoji. Ja potpuno priznajem Crnogorce kao narod i ne mislim da su svi Crnogorci Srbi, ali mislim da smo isuviše slični da bi se razdvajali i stvarali neprijatnosti između dva večna prijatelja - Srbije i Crne Gore. --serbiana talk 23:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zašto nećeš da mi odgovoriš? --serbiana - talk 22:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Auuuu, samo učvršćuješ stereotipije koje Srbi imaju prema Crnogorcima... Budi pristojan. --serbiana - talk 01:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

“Medicine” is the new MCOTW

Hello! Medicine, which you voted for, has been selected as this week’s medicine collaboration of the week. You are invited to help improve it! — Knowledge Seeker দ 01:56, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history Collaboration of the Fortnight

You supported Greek War of Independence, which has been selected as the Military history WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Fortnight. Please help improve this article to featured article standards. Kirill Lok s h in 22:41, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kraljevina Crna Gora

Do you think that Montenegro's Royal Family should be reinstated? I think that a new Kingdom of Montenegro under HRH Prince Nikola II Petrovic-Njegos would attain just the right amount of additional charisma in the eyes of the Western Monarchies. Are you for the Monarchy too? --HolyRomanEmperor 22:07, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Usrpage edit.

I edited your userpage to correct some spelling (Redlink). 68.39.174.238 01:37, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WikiProject Montenegro

I will be honoured to start that WikiProject. I'll do the basic shell as soon as I find time, while you can handle the inner fillings and attract more people to join the WikiProject.

But look at the highly-advanced Monarchies of the European Union: Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Spain or the Beneleux countries: the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxemburg... or what about Great Britain? --HolyRomanEmperor 20:31, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The magnificent Petar II Petrović Njegoš is also one of my major articles. I tried to present him encyclopedicly as a person that adored poetry, philosophy, history and cherished Serbian nationality but at the same time made Montenegro strong, powerful and independent, so little on the map yet so big in the History of the Balkans and Europe... ah... too bad those days are over. :O) --HolyRomanEmperor 11:48, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To become an administrator

First of all, a user, to become an admin, must be neutral. HolyRomanEmperor isn't. --Aeternus 15:49, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Be sure to place this:

This user is a participant in WikiProject Montenegro

and it's almost up and running. --HolyRomanEmperor 19:34, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I was wondering why would want independence for Montenegro? I'm Serb, about as old as you, living in the Peg. Let me start off by saying that Montenegro is a beautiful place. Sveti Stefan is absolutely amazing. Really, I've looked at this a lot, but what claims do you have that you are diverse from Serbs? I mean really, what would happen to our basketball team? I don't know how many are Montenegrin, not any I think, but I know the soccer team has a few I'm sure. The basketball team is doing bad anyways, but what happens if you guys do you get your independence? Wouldn't it be better to just stick through it? So what would happen if we won the World Cup (I pray we do, but unlikely), would you want to split then or celebrate with your fellow Serb brothers?

I'm not old enough to know what it's like there as I left when I was a small child and haven't returned but I know that Montenegrins (at least from what my folks tell me, not they're opinion though, they'd be happy living in Yugoslavia of 1980) is that you guys are sometimes or often made fun of by Serbs and others. Which I find dumb because we don't need to be even more seperated. Think about it. Montenegrin or Serb, it's the same religion, were the same religion (mostly), the same language, orally and written, that is unlike any other 2 "cultures" in the the former Yugoslavia. Croats are Catholic, so are Slovenes, but they have they're own language that's different ( I once had a teacher of Slovenian decent so I can tell you). Bosnians, well we don't know what they are. But anyways that's my argument, or opinion, I'm just wondering what you think. I'd really liked to have written this in Serbian/Montenegrin? but I'd probably take me an hour lol. C-c-c-c 06:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CSIRO is ACOTF

Hi. You voted for Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation as Australian Collaboration. It has been selected, so please help to improve this article in any way you can. Thanks. Scott Davis ^Talk 15:11, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COTW Project

You voted for Caribbean Sea, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. -Scottwiki 03:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SCOTW

File:Chemistry-stub.png

You voted for Ammonia and this article is now the current Science Collaboration of the Week!
Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia science article.

WikiProject Montenegro

...have you forgotten completly about it? (Wikipedia:WikiProject Montenegro) --HolyRomanEmperor 16:24, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pitanje...?

I can see that you changed the "crno gorski" language template from cyrillic to latin. My question is does "crno gorski" use latin or cyrillic. (I had a huge dispute with the Bosnian language template, since HRE wanted to add cyrillic. I did not like the addition of cyrillic. Hopefully, you will not have to go through a long battle, as we (Bosnians had to go through)). Also, when is Crna Gora splitting from Serbia, do you think that you guys will be able to "win" the referendum (ako bogda)!

Thanks, Kseferovic 19:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I do not agree with your statement that Bosnian uses both. Serbs tend to say that they speak Serbian, not Bosnian. So, if they use cyrillic, they are in fact using Serbian. In Bosnia, all three languages are recognized, but the cyrillic part comes from the Serbian language. I am Bosnian (living outside of Bosnia) and have never learned cyrillic, so I do not feel that all Bosnians know/should know cyrillic, however, everyone (due to other languages such as English, German, etc.) must know latin. Not all Bosnians are represented by cyrillic, but all are by latin. Also putting cyrillic on the template implies that I understand, can write, and read cyrillic when I cannot.

Thanks, Kseferovic 19:37, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glas Crnogoraca

You might want to read this Глас Црногораца/La Voix de Montenegro from 24 September 1920. It shows one of the main errors of the Belgrade government - what they did to Montenegro and the Montenegrin people. I've got loads of more info on that part. Since you're interested, tell me and I'll give some quotations of Nicholas I how he calls the Montenegrins for independence & similiar. --HolyRomanEmperor 20:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I shamefully agree with you...

You are entirely correct - my current place of residing is Belgrade. I am a (semi-)respected historian in here, so I have access to the United and Republican Archives as well as the City Archive - here's is also the greatest library of historical works in former Yugoslavia, so I suggest that might be the main issue - I have access to nearly the each and every part of Serbian history. But, can I be really blamed for that? --HolyRomanEmperor 14:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

eeee koji si ti lik :)

Pregledajući nominacije, slučajno sam uočio da si glasao za dosta njih (zastava baš upada u oci). A onda sam se malo bolje zagledao i provalio da si glasao za gotovo sve nominacije, a Beograd je u onih 10% za koje nisi glasao :). Pretpostavljam da te je iznervirala poruka: "You MAY Wish to vote...", pa si tako postupio... ili mrziš Beograd. I da, jos jedna stvar južna autonomna pokrajina republike Srbije se ne zove Kosova već Kosovo barem za sad, a ti ne živiš u budućnosti vec sadašnjosti! Hvala ti što podržavaš BRAĆU Srbe! Ja lično sam takodje za uspešnost referenduma, pa ako bog da dobićete nezavisnost. Ne, ne mrzim ja Crnogorce, niti sam protiv zajedničke države vec smorili ste žešće bre svim skandalima i ostalim munjama, pa nek vam je sa srećom! Reply Would be nice --Kris12

Cities of Montenegro

E, sokole, vidim da si danas bio neuobičajeno vrijedan za jednog Crnogorca :-), pa dodao {{Montenegro}} u gradove. Da dokažem da mogu biti vredniji od jednog Crnogorca :-), ja sam napravio slike sa lokacijama, sredio {{Infobox Montenegro}} i dodao {{Montenegro}} gdje je falio. Još da se nađe jedna junačina pa da popuni sve podatke... Mogao bi da zađeš po zvaničnim sajtovima opština pa da mazneš i središ grbove. (A i onaj što si stavio na Kolašin da malo okrešeš). Ako budeš to radio, pazi na copyright... mislim da ima neka odrednica kao što je "flag" ili "coat of arms" koja dozvoljava, u principu, korišćenje grba u članku. Aj' pozdrav. Duja 05:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Choosing Belgrade

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Belgrade was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:23, 1 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

Reply

However, the Bosnian language uses the Cyrillic scrypt as well. It's merely historical - the Bosnian Cyrillic is a famous old scrypt that was used and the Cyrillic was the standard scrypt in Bosnian Krajina. However, are you sure that Montenegrins don't use the Cyrillic scrypt, I mean, as long as I can remember, I saw much more Cyrilic than Latin in Montenegro; it's more historical, compared to the Latin scrypt and even Milo Djukanovich' (and other parties) of Montenegro use it: see Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro. --HolyRomanEmperor 13:25, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]