User talk:Cwobeel/Archives/2016/January
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Cwobeel. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Happy New Year, Cwobeel!
Cwobeel,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 10:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy New Year
Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. |
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message
Disambiguation link notification for January 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick Alan Ross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abduction. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:November 2015 Paris attacks
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:November 2015 Paris attacks. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 January 2016
- News and notes: The WMF's age of discontent
- In the media: Impenetrable science; Jimmy Wales back in the UAE
- Arbitration report: Catflap08 and Hijiri88 case been decided
- Featured content: Featured menagerie
- WikiProject report: Try-ing to become informed - WikiProject Rugby League
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick Snyder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Recklessness. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
question from a journalist
Hi Cwobeel! I’m a journalist with The New York Times. I’m writing a story about the role Wikipedia plays in U.S. politics, particularly the presidential race. I’d like to talk to a couple of frequent editors on pages related to the candidates and the election -- and you seem to fit that description. I’d want to ask you about what motivates you to edit Wikipedia, how you see Wikipedia’s role in the election and how you balance your own political views (if any) with ensuring Wikipedia stays fair. Thanks! If you’d be willing to help, please let me know. I’m jeremy.merrill@nytimes.com on email and gchat/XMPP, jeremybmerrill on Skype and +1-212-556-1262. Jeremybmerrill (talk) 22:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Jeremybmerrill:. Thanks for reaching out, but I am not interested. Good luck with others! - Cwobeel (talk) 22:28, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Cwobeel: Okay, thanks for the quick reply. Jeremybmerrill (talk) 22:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Easy with the revert button
Please read [1]in conjunction with WP:TERRORIST. That was the edit I reverted for, although it caught another of yours. And if you are tempted to reply that your edit was the first of a series, please read WP:OWNFEET. I do not see that there is anything here to go easy with. Please be good enough to explain. Philip Trueman (talk) 17:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- I corrected my false positive, but you did not. In any case, we are good. - Cwobeel (talk) 17:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
barnstar
For exceptional and tireless work on the Malheur article from day one. LavaBaron (talk) 05:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
ENGVAR
Please don't change dmy date format metadata to mdy. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 January 2016
- Community view: Battle for the soul of the WMF
- Editorial: We need a culture of verification
- In focus: The Crisis at New Montgomery Street
- Op-ed: Transparency
- Traffic report: Pattern recognition: Third annual Traffic Report
- Special report: Wikipedia community celebrates Public Domain Day 2016
- News and notes: Community objections to new Board trustee
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Arbitration report: Interview: outgoing and incumbent arbitrators 2016
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes
There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what What should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Habib Ali al-Jifri
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Habib Ali al-Jifri. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
January 2016
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Militarism. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 04:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Dl2000: What do you mean? My edits are compliant with WP:MOS, are they not? - Cwobeel (talk) 14:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Help needed with Steve Comisar article.
Please be so kind as to help me edit the Steve Comisar article. I see that you have worked on it before. I'm new at this and don't know how to do it. I'd like to add these 2 new sentences to the end of the "career" section:
The FBI ranked Comisar in the top ten con men of all time, second only to Frank Abagnale, the subject of the motion picture, Catch Me if You Can, directed by Steven Spielberg.[12] Comisar had supporting roles as an actor in various motion pictures, television shows, and commercials.[3]
[12] is a new link from "The New York Observer" (reliable source): http://observer.com/2015/11/how-watching-mr-robot-made-me-paranoid-about-getting-hacked/
(see last 2 pages of Observer article referencing Comisar)
[3] is the existing link from the GQ Magazine article.
Thanks for your help with this. I'm only a beginner. Curiouskitten777 (talk) 17:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
GQ article is a reliable source.
The GQ article is a reliable source. It was an investigative piece written by Sabrina Erdely, an award-winning journalist. (see her Wikipedia page) The article clearly references Comisar's acting. GQ was used to reference Comisar's acting in the very first version of the article. Every subsequent version of the article over the past 4 years mentioned his acting until last month. The mention of his acting only became problematic when IMDb was added as an additional reference. One short sentence about his acting, referenced by GQ, at the end of the career section seems reasonable. This in no way implies that he is notable as an actor. This merely reveals the biographical fact that he did some acting. If anyone agrees, please edit.
"Comisar had supporting acting roles in several motion pictures, television shows, and commercials.[3]"
[3] GQ article link.
I also strongly disagree that the Observer piece is not a reliable source. It was not an opinion piece, and it was not from a blog. It was an investigative article from the actual New York Observer newspaper, a very reliable source. (see their Wikipedia page) I'd ask that you please reconsider this edit as well. If anyone agrees, please edit.
"The FBI has ranked Comisar in the top ten con men of all time, second only to Frank Abagnale, the subject of the motion picture, Catch Me if You Can, directed by Steven Spielberg.[12]"
[12] The New York Observer http://observer.com/2015/11/how-watching-mr-robot-made-me-paranoid-about-getting-hacked/
I completely agree with everything else that all of the other editors had to say about this article. A big heartfelt thanks to @Tokyogirl79, @DanielRigal, @LjL, and @Onel5969, for educating me on the Wikipedia editing process. You all seem like very intelligent, dedicated, and decent people. Keep up the good work.
205.115.188.114 (talk) 20:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 January 2016
- News and notes: Vote of no confidence; WMF trustee speaks out
- In the media: 15th anniversary news round-up
- Traffic report: Danse Macabre
- Featured content: This week's featured content
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 January 2016
- News and notes: Geshuri steps down from the Board
- In the media: Media coverage of the Arnnon Geshuri no-confidence vote
- Recent research: Bursty edits; how politics beat religion but then lost to sports; notability as a glass ceiling
- Traffic report: Death and taxes
- Featured content: This week's featured content
DYK for Jonas Åkerlund (politician)
On 29 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jonas Åkerlund (politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sweden Democrat Jonas Åkerlund called immigrants "parasites" during a broadcast on his party's radio station in 2002? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jonas Åkerlund (politician). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 January 2016 (UTC)