Jump to content

User talk:DESIULTRA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:DESI BOY 420)

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, DESI BOY 420! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SkyWarrior 01:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@SkyWarrior Thankyou! DESI BOY 420 (talk) 04:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
Hi! I'm Perfect4th, your mentor. I'd like to echo SkyWarrior's welcome. Though you don't seem too unfamiliar with the workings of the encyclopedia, you're welcome to drop by my talk page if you ever have any questions! Happy editing! Perfect4th (talk) 14:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

[edit]

Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Warner Bros. Discovery India, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 06:07, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

[edit]

Glad to see the global lock was an error. Hope you can get back to editing soon! Perfect4th (talk) 13:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ThankYou! AKSHIT.EDITOR 16:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies about the global block. I think what happened is that a little bit ago I processed a request at WP:ACC that turned out to be a block-evading vandal/troll, and when they were found out and blocked it affected my IP as well, since I did create the account. A checkuser on Wikipedia dealt with it and determined I was indeed unrelated to the troll, but a global steward did not realize this and globally locked my IP... as well as the accounts of every single account I processed at ACC over the past month or so, including yours.
It appears to have been dealt with for now, and I do apologize for any inconvenience it may have caused you.
On another unrelated note. I would highly encourage you read our guideline on signatures, specifically WP:SIGAPP, and change your signature accordingly... yellow on white just does not work and is unreadable. SkyWarrior 00:54, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. No problem Thanks! AKSHIT.EDITOR 14:52, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help I am blocked without any reason again as a sockpuppet which is not associated with me. Is this again an error. AKSHIT.EDITOR 15:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. You were blocked per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amanheheh337, but it was based on behavior and not any checkuser evidence (that I'm aware of). Your best bet is to submit an unblock appeal; see here for more information.
I will warn you, though, that just saying "I'm not actually Amanhehehe337, please unblock" will not work, you'll need to actually convince an admin that you are, in fact, unrelated and the block was an error. Although, since this isn't a CU block, a quick check should be able to tell if this really was an error (or not). SkyWarrior 00:41, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now a checkuser blocked me without any reason as a sockpuppet I am not sockpuppet AKSHIT.EDITOR 10:28, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please help in my unblock AKSHIT.EDITOR 10:29, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You created this account and you know that this is not a sockpuppet account. AKSHIT.EDITOR 10:29, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When I blocked,

[edit]

the software did not add a block notice with unblock instructions. Please use the template

" {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

Sorry for the inconvenience. I'm sure we can straighten this out. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:39, 14 July 2022 (UTC) Blocking Admin Deepfriedokra[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DESIULTRA (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked because my behaviour was like user Amanheheh337 because he also removed redirect and I also. I was not aware of this if i will copy other's edit than I will be blocked. Sorry for it. I removed the page for page that I created Warner Bros. Discovery India so that if someone want to know he will be able to understand more about page. I want to unblock because I created many articles and want to create more. I am not sockpuppet of Amanheheh337. You can check my edits please unblock me AKSHIT.EDITOR 09:45, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 10:15, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

DeepfriedokraPlease unblock me reason is that Wikipedia do not censor innocent I was blocked 2 times Later I was unblocked. Please unblock me AKSHIT.EDITOR 09:49, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeepfriedokraI did nothing wrong just removed redirect only please unblock me.

AKSHIT.EDITOR 09:50, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not opposed to unblock if reviewing admins things I am mistaken. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:59, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeepfriedokraPlease unblock me till admins will review so that I will more information in Warner Bros. Discovery India

DeepfriedokraHold my block till review. AKSHIT.EDITOR 10:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me I want to edit more on my pages. AKSHIT.EDITOR 10:19, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One of my great failings is that I am prone to self doubt. I was second guessing my original conclusion and my decision to block. A checkuser has confirmed my conclusion and my decision to block were correct. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:01, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, regarding your request to check your edits, I did and that led me to conclude this is yet another sock of Amanheheh337. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:14, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Warner Bros. Discovery India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hardly notable; article created by sockpuppet account. Can be merged with Warner Bros. Discovery Asia-Pacific if possible.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ilhamnobi (talk) 06:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]