User talk:DFXYME
Welcome!
[edit]Hi DFXYME! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! DMySon (talk) 14:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sujawalpur has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:08, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Subhanpur Muradnagar has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
SL93 (talk) 03:02, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Shahampur Kot (December 20)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shahampur Kot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shahampur Kot, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, DFXYME!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
|
- Hi KylieTastic, Thank You for your time to review my draft. I have added some other references please check if those are suitable. here Draft:Shahampur Kot. DFXYME (talk) 19:14, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hey DFXYME thanks for updating and resubmitting. KylieTastic (talk) 19:20, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Bollywoodlife.com
[edit]So, yes, one user at the Teahouse pointed to this thread that suggested concern that bollywoodlife.com might be gossipy and not a very reliable source. But that doesn't automatically make it so, and you don't need to now find every single citation using this website and remove them as such. Some of those citations are interviews with the article's subject, or just a list of winners of an awards show. These aren't inherently unreliable. Please take caution when editing and removing sources. --ZimZalaBim talk 20:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Georg Butzbach draft page
[edit]Hi DFXYME! You left a message on my talkpage, telling me you moved the newly created Georg Butzbach page to draft-space. That's just sad, now noone will see & improve it. RoMancer (talk) 11:55, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Neelofar
[edit]Hey user! You added a notability tag to the page Neelofar. Could you please elaborate on why do you find the references not credible enough since I have added only that information which is public news and has been mentioned on credible media portals. SassySunshine20 11:2, 7 January 2022 (IST) — Preceding undated comment added 06:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Shahampur Kot has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Numberguy6 (talk) 23:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Nomination of Brajesh Kumar Tiwari for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brajesh Kumar Tiwari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hatchens (talk) 11:29, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hello My friend Hatchens, I am not opposing your afd but you should look the references once more. These are from reliable websites like Worldcat, World bank and Publons. DFXYME (talk) 11:40, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- @DFXYME no they are not! WorldCat OCLC identifier is generated for any author whose books are indexed with WorldCat-member libraries. Besides that, his books has not been even reviewed with any reputed journal or media. On top of that, his Scopus profile is having an h-index of 2, which is in total contradiction to Google scholar h-index number. Please don't try to create greatness out of mediocrity. Kindly continue your reasonings at the AfD discussion page and try to generate a consensus. All the best. - Hatchens (talk) 11:51, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Faraz Haider (musician) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faraz Haider (musician), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faraz Haider (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.