User talk:Damolat

Welcome!

Hello, Damolat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Darkwind (talk) 17:30, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Evansnig2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Evansnig2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tunde Kelani.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Darkwind (talk) 17:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tunde-kelani.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Tunde-kelani.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:49, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tunde Kelani concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tunde Kelani, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 04:19, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tunde Kelani concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tunde Kelani, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tunde Kelani[edit]

Hello Damolat. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Tunde Kelani".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tunde Kelani}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:53, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Biografer (talk) 23:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 20:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your question regarding vandalism[edit]

Lucky for you, you only get a warning for now, but if you return to your old habit, chances for a block will be high. Admins in this project are nice once and only once. As for your question regarding vandalism; Don't even joke about it. Being blocked for vandalism can range from a day and a half to 2 straight days. The highest mark is indefinite block (aka 6 months). And to accomplish that is not hard at all. Any editor who will blank any page in main space, will be subject to an indefinite block with a single report to Admin's who fight vandalism. As a side note, if by any chance it will be discovered that your account is used for vandalism only, you can say goodbye to the project for good. Was that clear enough?--Biografer (talk) 04:46, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Biografer: You just want to rub it in right, ok have a field day. Enjoy yourself. I have been on Wikipedia for over 4 years, posted several value adding articles without any blemish and just by making a mistake in 1 day, I automatically get labelled with an 'old habit'. I believe thats rather unfair, especially when I even accepted that I didn't know what I did was wrong. What ever happened to being magnanimous. I don't think there's any point over-flogging the issue. You should note not everybody spends their entire life on wikipedia. Cheers!Damolat (talk) 07:49, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately life is not fair, neither is Wikipedia. I'm sorry if you got treated that way. Didn't knew that you were here for 4 years. It happens to many people. First, they award with barnstars, and the next they toss you out like a rotten orange.--Biografer (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Ice Prince and adding the same web site to multiple articles[edit]

Hello Damolat. You've been warned per the result of an edit warring complaint. You can be blocked if you again try to add a link to mymusic.com.ng to any articles, unless you have first got consensus on the talk page that the link is appropriate. We usually describe this pattern of edits as spamming. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:49, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]