User talk:Danh90

License tagging for Image:NeilBuchanan 2006.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:NeilBuchanan 2006.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Neil Buchanan , you will be blocked. --Ed (Edgar181) 20:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Neil Buchanan[edit]

I'm surprised to see an older contributor vandalising the Neil Buchanan article - surely you know by now that most vandalism is nuked incredibly quickly, and it's not really worth it? You've made some positive contributions - please keep that up. riana_dzasta 10:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Danh90 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to phil mitchell , you will be blocked. --Ed (slangman) 12:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Natasha Mealey[edit]

An editor has nominated Natasha Mealey, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Mealey and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 22:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent vandalism, please clarify.[edit]

Is it true that your IP address is 86.136.0.96, and that you are just blanking your own page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chaffers (talk • contribs) 12:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Blocked users are still able to edit their own user and talk pages, so please blank your page using the Danh90 account. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 13:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Danh90! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 900 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Natasha Mealey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Natasha Mealey[edit]

I have nominated Natasha Mealey, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Mealey (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sid1977 (talk) 23:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Natasha Mealey[edit]

The article Natasha Mealey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, partially negative biography of a living person. Please do not remove this prod tag without sourcing the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 06:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]