User talk:Daniel32357
|
License tagging for Image:Kid dropper.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Kid dropper.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Arch clement.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Arch clement.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Daniel32357! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bangelfire\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 11:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
May 2007[edit]
Harry Pierpont[edit]
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Harry Pierpont on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (Diff) Ford MF 22:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Frank Hacke[n]thal[edit]
Hi there. You recently created identical articles Frank Hackenthal and Frank Hackethal, but it's actually not entirely clear which one is the correct spelling. Please add any comments you might have at Talk:Frank Hackethal. Thanks, Hqb (talk) 19:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Criminals[edit]
I note that you're making a lot of articles about criminals. Just a word of advice - do not use the works of Jay Robert Nash as a source (read his article to see why). DS (talk) 23:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
October 2008[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Egan's Rats. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --The Firewall 04:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Charles Rogers (murder suspect)[edit]
I have nominated Charles Rogers (murder suspect), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Rogers (murder suspect). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Peripitus (Talk) 12:44, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)