User talk:Danni Sabic

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello! and welcome to Wikipedia! New to Wikipedia? Introduction if you aren't then please read Privacy Policy and About Wikipedia! Please enjoy your day and happy editing! Beyonder (talk) 12:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)BeyonderGod[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Boushnak (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

See WP:Notability (artists) for requirements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laura Boushnak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Danni Sabic, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Boushnak (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laura Boushnak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Boushnak (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

May satisfy WP:CREATIVE considering the Birmingham Museum exhibition but make certain the photo is clear for encyclopedia use and also add any further available in-depth third-party news sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laura Boushnak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Boushnak (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Honestly, what would've actually helped for notability was if there were permanently collected works by major art museums and I still haven't seen any signs of this so I can't accept.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laura Boushnak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 00:11, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Laura Boushnak has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Laura Boushnak. Thanks! Worldbruce (talk) 14:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Boushnak has been accepted

Laura Boushnak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 15:07, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Respect other editors' work

Hello. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Laura Boushnak. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 05:47, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not mention birthplace in the opening brackets of the lead sentence alongside the birth date, MOS:BIRTHPLACE.
Do not link common occupations, WP:OVERLINKING.
Do not place external links in the body of an article, WP:EL.
Links to each country in the list: Egypt, Yemen, Kuwait, Jordan and Tunisia, especially in a paragraph that already links Arab world, are not an aid to the reader. The reader needn't read an entire encyclopedia article about the etymology, history, geography, demographics, economy, politics, etc., etc. of each country in order to understand Laura Boushnak. The same goes for Paris, and for Lebanon where the more specific location Beirut is already linked in the same sentence.
The lead is a summary of the article, it should not include information not in the body of the article, MOS:INTRO. (I have moved the content into the body. If you copy the material back, note two things. First, newspaper and magazine names should be italicized, WP:MOSTITLE. Second, for readability, citations are often discouraged in the lead unless required, such as by a direct quote or an extraordinary claim. It would be extraordinary if someone had kept a job as a wire service photographer for nearly a decade without having photos published in many outlets, so the claim does not require inline citations.)
Bildmuseet is neither a newspaper nor a magazine, so it doesn't fit in that sentence. I've removed it for now because the only new thing it says about Boushnak is that her exhibition with Rawiya toured there, and you removed the list of exhibitions where that fact might have been useful.
Place citations immediately after punctuation, not before.
Do not remove sourced content without an explanation of how Wikipedia is improved by its removal, WP:REMOVAL.
Do not capitalize a field of study unless it is a proper noun (e.g. French literature), MOS:CAPS.
A statement like "published in The New York Times" is proven by a single citation. It is not "more" proven by two or three citations, which is a form of WP:CITEKILL. There is nothing notable about a photojournalist doing their job - getting photos published. It is bizarre that you have removed nearly every source about Boushnak - the ones that prove she is notable, and replaced them with many more sources that are by Boushnak or that have a vested interest in promoting her. The bulk of any article must be based on sources independent of the subject, WP:THIRDPARTY.
After the first mention, do not refer to the subject by first name, WP:SURNAME
Do not remove red links, especially inter-language links, unless Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject, WP:RED.
Avoid language, such as "Recently", that easily becomes dated, MOS:RELTIME.
Who represents Boushnak is promotional material inappropriate for Wikipedia, which is not a platform for advertising, marketing, or public relations, WP:NOTPROMOTION.

--Worldbruce (talk) 06:54, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Laura Boushnak, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]