User talk:Dawihq

Welcome!

Hello, Dawihq, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 21:41, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hawazin has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hawazin was changed by Dawihq (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880581 on 2017-11-18T22:24:28+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:24, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of General Hmood Dawi Al-Qthami

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on General Hmood Dawi Al-Qthami requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 14:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article has a number of problems: it makes no credible claim of notability for him; Wikipedia's [[:mos:|style]] does not include military or honorific titles in the name of the article; and biographies of living people require that at least one independent verifiable reliable source is cited. Cabayi (talk) 14:08, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of General Hmood Dawi Al-Qthami

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on General Hmood Dawi Al-Qthami requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jack Frost (talk) 08:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with General Hmood Dawi Al-Qthami. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 10:42, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at General Hmood Dawi Al-Qthami, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Cabayi (talk) 10:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recreating the article so soon after it was previously deleted, with none of the problems addressed, is just a waste of everybody's time. Cabayi (talk) 10:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dawihq I'm so sorry, I didn't know what I was doing. Please don't block me, as I spend a lot of time researching and uploading information on this site. Also, I left a message for you on your page about my article Wikipedia. Please help me do the right steps to include the information I added to the article. Dawihq (talk) 15:00, 26 November 2017 (AST)

DawihqI noticed that you have reverted the page back to before I started working on it. Now I've done a lot of research on the topic, and I need to add this information for prosperity, as the books I'm reading, then translating into Arabia, then writing in English from, will never see the light of day in the states. Therefore, please, I have worked hard on this, how do I restore my contributions without being blocked? Do I remove all the blog refrences, because I will do that easily. Please, please, please. Help. Respond to me. Dawihq (talk) 15:00, 26 November 2017 (AST)

Please don't conduct the same discussion on multiple pages, it gets confusing.

The reference you've added to the General's article is by him. It needs references about him.

Read the links I've already provided about sources - WP:RS, WP:IS, WP:V. Cabayi (talk) 12:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi For now, I don't want to create a page for General Hmood anymore. For the time being, I need to focus on finding the best references I have for another article that was unfortunately deleted by you. Also, I'm not an expert with this chat format. Please be patient and understanding with a newcomer. Dawihq (talk) 15:39, 26 November 2017 (AST

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Otaibah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ishmaelite (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:11, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hello, can you please add your sources to The Battles of Otaibah? All articles need sources from the start. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:14, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Battles of Otaibah

The article The Battles of Otaibah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced information which can (if sourced) be merged into the main article on the tribe. Without references, this is of questionable value at best

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:27, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of General Hmood Dawi Al-Qthami for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article General Hmood Dawi Al-Qthami is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Hmood Dawi Al-Qthami until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 12:50, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dawihq. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dawihq. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Exalted Society Of Authenticity (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Mirror Cracked were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Exalted Society Of Authenticity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Exalted Society Of Authenticity, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dawihq! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Exalted Society Of Authenticity concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Exalted Society Of Authenticity, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Exalted Society Of Authenticity

Hello, Dawihq. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Exalted Society Of Authenticity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]