User talk:Dharani Maran
Welcome!
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia, Dharani Maran! I am Linguisticgeek and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Linguisticgeek (talk) 08:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
citing scholarly links
[edit]thank you for registering and for pandya lineage add scholarly links.it is not necessary they should be online.you can add books too as reference while doing so state the name of the author pg no of the book name of the book and ISBN number.Linguisticgeek (talk)
books
[edit]Iyer article has books as citations another wiki link is to show the main article.Linguisticgeek (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Books
[edit]Have provided some book names and citations before.Are they not sufficient.
no they are not precise citations.see how iyer article or Tamil people article has precise references.book name page no what the page says if the book is not online etc.also don't forget ISBN NumberLinguisticgeek (talk) 08:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- If you check out WP:CITE, it will show you how to properly cite material, including books. If the sources is locked up in government archives like you are stating, and there is no way to get the citation information, then it might not be possible to use it as a source. Ishdarian|lolwut 08:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:25, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]Good to know that you are keen to contribute on wikipedia.for adding these sources please talk to User User:SpacemanSpiff.He can help you out.for he has protected the page.have a good day.LinguisticGeek 05:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
the tone and style as well as presentation of the article is a serious problem.it's not of neutral (eg words like prideful heir of pandyas etc) see below for details on our policy/ btwn did you notice i did remove one template since inline citation has been provided.for further details see spacemanspiff regarding locking.LinguisticGeek 10:20, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring and sock puppetry.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!
September 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LinguisticGeek 11:41, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
hi,firstly the nadar article has been tagged too because the source is a problem.second this pandyan claim thing should be precise book citations by scholars where it is clearly mentioned.i think the problem arises because there hasn't been any serious research done by genuine scholars on who the descendants of the pandyans actually are.also the parava article needs lot of cleaning see the wiki format on writing good articles especially the tone and style.happy editing.LinguisticGeek 04:17, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
hi between i came across this page [1] .They also claim to be be pandyans.sources are pretty precise if you observe.LinguisticGeek 04:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
see no original research on wikipedia.also the article has a lot of other problems other the pandyan claim.tone and style.you can solve that problem than being stuck on the pandyan claim.also if you are a reasearcher than get your thesis(abt paravs being pandyas) published by some university and then you can use that as a legitimate source on wikipedia.you can't draw conclusion just like that history is dynamic .happy editing.LinguisticGeek 14:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
don't remove the tags put it back.make the corrections with citations now and i will check tomorrow if tags need to removed.i don't have time today.LinguisticGeek 15:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
I am able to give many references concerning the low caste status of the Paravar; here is one: [2], "Many of the Paravar are today tappers.". Stop your POV, vandalism, falsifications else i will provide more & more refs to show the low caste status of the Paravar.83.202.182.67 (talk) 10:41, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]look this pandyan claim by most tamil castes including paravar ,shanar(nadar) and others is original research and synthesis and a complete mess concerning tone and style.there isn't solid proof or evidence regarding most of these theories.wikipedia clearly needs scholarly citations. both the Nadar (caste) and Paravas article has been tagged problematic because of this concern. i might no longer be able to guide you because of time constraints and other editing which i have to do.you can ask your queries to some editors or use the help me tag.thank you LinguisticGeek 12:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]You didn't actually give me any sources. Ishdarian|lolwut 12:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. LinguisticGeek 09:16, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Thayiram iruntha nera vada meen thayoli mavane —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.103.111 (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Paravar
[edit]Thanks for you help on Paravar. A few things.
- Please try to use full reference formats for the references you add. Some samples include {{Cite news}}, {{Cite web}}, and {{Cite book}}, as these enable other readers to look up the information you provide in detail. There's even an easy way to do that--if you go to "My preferences" in the upper right, then go to the tab marked "Editing", near the bottom, click on "Enable enhanced editing toolbar". This will add some functionality to your edit box, include a way to get pop up boxes that give you the most commonly needed fields for references.
- Please read through our policy requiring the use of a neutral point of view, which you can find at WP:NPOV. Much of what you just added was highly non-neutral; for example, the use of terms like "excellent" and "highly learned" are not neutral, and thus can't be in WP articles.
- Please be careful to provide extremely high quality sources for highly questionable claims, like the idea that the catamaran come specifically from the Paravar. We'll need a very strong source that explains that in detail to make such a claim. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
ya warriors of a tribal(kattuvasi) community.Tax collector is another way of saying chieftian(they had complete civil authority). 10% of a very huge nadar population(the nadars constitute 80 to 90% of the population of southern tirunelveli and around Korkai!) is actually large. We lived in a real society. Not alone near the stinking sea. The paravars are a schedule caste near Kanniyakumari because dey are tribal illiterates.Sellin anythin dead or dealin with dead things is a extremely polluting occupation(the parayars made leather out the skin of dead animals and the paravars sold dead fish) and the paravars had to stay very far away from a brahmin territory unlike Nadars. The Nadar climbers or Shanars climbed trees and produced jaggery primarily. Toddy was only sold by some nadars. Thevars and nadars live in the same region(like in sivakasi and kamudi) not near the kuppam. Thevars will never consider a bunch of fisherman as their kin and the two races HAVE NOTHING in common.Manymembers of the Mukkulathore community are classed as backward caste(like kallars and agamudayars). Even the Ambattans(barber caste) come under the MBC category.Morever I have posted a link clearly provin that you were below the assaris and nadars.what is even more important is our current position in the society 'TODAY'. i am very well aware of the status of your caste(very poor!I ve seen many tamil movies like citizen)i am through arguing here and i am goin to mind my work from now on.so please.or do you want more.and watch your mouth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.96.136.80 (talk) 17:53, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Chevalier Roche Victoria.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Chevalier Roche Victoria.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Chevalier I.X.Pereira.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Chevalier I.X.Pereira.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Chevalier I.X.Pereira
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Chevalier I.X.Pereira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Music1201 talk 19:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Ways to improve Chevalier I.X.Pereira
[edit]Hi, I'm Snowycats. Dharani Maran, thanks for creating Chevalier I.X.Pereira!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hey there, great job writing a new article! I did mark your article as it needs some improvement, but I'm sure that it will be one of the many amazing articles on Wikipedia soon enough! If you have any questions, feel free to let me know! Good luck!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Snowycats (talk) 18:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Chevalier I.X.Pereira
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Chevalier I.X.Pereira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://archives.dailynews.lk/2002/04/11/bus11.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 09:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)