User talk:Dilek2

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dilek2! I am Dougweller and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Dougweller (talk) 16:04, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Ottomans today

Hi Dilek2, I am also interested in the subject of the living descendants of the Ottoman family. I have noticed that there have been many strange changes to their pages. 1 - Someone has added the word "Hazretleri" to all of their names. What does this mean? 2 - added a person who is not an Imperial Prince - I have removed this. 3 - There is a lot of information with no citations at all. It is difficult for me to add to the articles because I do not speak Turkish but perhaps we could work together to improve some of the articles. Please do contact me through my talk page. MissyMaddie (talk) 23:37, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hazretleri means Holy...

Ersin Faikzâde

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ersin Faikzâde, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.ersinfaikzade.net/hakkimda/detay/EN/1/Biography-Of-Ambassador-Ersin-Faikzade.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 15:28, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a Friend of Ersin and he allowed me to copy it... Dilek2 (talk) 21:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Emirzâde_Şaban_Bey

An article you have contributed to on Emirzâde_Şaban_Bey has been archived in case of deletion at a link that I am not supposed to tell you because it's spam. Please message or email me if you wish to hear about my Wikia site.

Thanks,
Mike James Michael DuPont (talk) 21:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bloked

I'm really shoked now, because I'm bloked...I only wrote about Ersin Faikzade a Turkish Man, and just 'm bloked...strange that all. But ok...Who care's...I see here are Racist on the Work. Dilek2 (talk) 00:31, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The blocking admin very clearly warned you that repeated removing of speedy deletion tags could lead to a block.[1] You have no reason to be shocked and engaging in personal attacks against the blocking admin will not help your case. Edward321 (talk) 00:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not talk with you.. you edit always the truth...not me... OK? so please look at yourself... Dilek2 (talk) 01:12, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The tragic fact is that Ersin Faikzâde may well be notable. If you stop ranting, pull your finger out and write a proper article, it might well stick. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:57, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He is a notable Person, he is a wellknown Person...But if you are bloked me...I see you hate me. The Problem is in WIKIPEDIA any Person can changend an Atricle.

Dilek2 (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haplogroup of Oğuzhan

Edward321, this sources is not from Facebook, this are the result of the Iginea DNA Study. So why you removed this wellknown Information?..Why you hate the descendant of Oghuz Kan?... Strange. I never removed any of your Article... But you do it by mine.

Why?

Because so many Turkish-people today claim to be a descendant of Oghuz Khan, male members of the Amucalar, descendants of Gündüz Gazi, the older brother of "Osman I, tested their Y-DNA. Genetic history of the Turkish people, shows that the common ancestor "Ertuğrul", belonged to haplogroup: R1a=6.9% - Typical of Central Asian, Caucasus, Eastern Europeans and Indo-Aryan people.

Dilek2 (talk) 15:14, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I said your haplogroup info was sourced from Facebook, because you said it was sourced from facebook.[2] I have repeatedly and clearly explained why - Wikipedia policies require the use of reliable sources.[3][4][5][6][7][8] Edward321 (talk) 16:22, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is 6.9% ? СЛУЖБА (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have any other Amuca individuals besides the Sarmasik family tested? СЛУЖБА (talk) 16:34, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's extremely better that you do a 111-marker test. 37 markers is too low to see whom you match. СЛУЖБА (talk) 16:30, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are my Stalker, just I see it...OH my GOD...

Dilek2 (talk) 22:43, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edward321, please delete not the Oghuzhan Article

http://www.ysearch.org/search_view.asp?uid=XWBWW&viewuid=FTEMF&p=1

Dilek2 (talk) 15:19, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First, I have never deleted any article, only admins can do that. Second, I have never edited the Oğuzhan article.[9] Third, your link is a commercial site, not a reliable source. Fourth, that link does not support any of your edits.Edward321 (talk) 00:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's better that you give a link to the FTDNA project. It's more reliable, with FTDNA, a very respected company, confirming that they have at least tested someone with this result. СЛУЖБА (talk) 16:24, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Any Person can delete an Article so what you told me now?

This Source have nothing to do with Facebook.

There are Tested it.

Dilek2 (talk) 01:11, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only administrators can delete articles. While you have listed something besides Facebook now, it is not a reliable source and it does not support any of your edits. Please read and apply Wikipedia:Identifying reliable source as you have been asked to by over a dozen editors over the last two years. What part of that is hard to understand? Edward321 (talk) 01:43, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rubbish

Re the following from your article: "Coleg England Ceredigion'da Public Relations, Aberystwyth University, received training in Intercultural Communication. During her stay in England worked as a volunteer for various projects."

The first sentence is pure gobbledegook - copy the proper version from his facebook page: "His subjects were Public Relations at the Coleg Ceredigion and Intercultural Communication at the University of Aberystwyth". But do not repeat the ghastly mistake on the facebook page: Aberystwyth is not in England - it is in Wales. "During her stay" - why the sex change? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:13, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand you... I'am a friend of Ersin because we are Family related. He allowed me to copy it from his own Page... Sex changend? Look please what Edward always's do it...He removed all my sources. — Dilek2 (talk) 17:24, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But you copied it wrong - give me a link to the page where it appears in the garbled fashion you used. Sex change - you said "her stay" - should be "his stay". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:39, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here: http://www.ersinfaikzade.net/anasayfa/index/EN — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dilek2 (talk • contribs)

I think you were trying to point me to this page where you will see the text: "His subjects were Public Relations at the Coleg Ceredigion and Intercultural Communication at the University of Aberystwyth. During his stay in England". Note "his" not "her" and exactly the text that I have already quoted, not your gobbledegook. (I do realise that you went to Turkish version of the page and traslated it badly.) — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saliha Sultana

The article Saliha Sultana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person. I'm unable to find any references in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oo7565 (talk) 18:24, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you are unable to find sources its your own Problem not mine, but i delete it, dont worry

i see here in the english category too many racists in work

Dilek2 (talk) 17:18, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is the burden of the person wishing to add content to provide a reliable source for the content.

Also note that calling other editors racists is a personal attack that is not allowed. Please refrain from such behavior in the future.

If you do not wish to follow wikipedia's rules and guidelines, you will find your time here very unpleasant and very short. -- The Red Pen of Doom 17:44, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are nothing worth about me, so shud up.

Dilek2 (talk) 01:14, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fehime Sultan

Edward you really a stupid man, where are your sources that she had a girl who called Nemzade (1913-2000)

I often told you look like your self...there is nor sources in the Article Fehime Sultan that she had a daughter...

Here look this:

2) H.I.H. Princess Fahima Sultana. b. at the Dolma Bahche Palace, Constantinople, 2nd August 1875 (d/o Mail-i-Sharvat). Rcvd: the Nishan-i-Shafakat 1st class. m. (first) at the Yildiz Palace, 12th September 1901 (div. at Ortakoy, 4th November 1908) H.H. Damad 'Ali Ghalib Pasha (b. at Constantinople, 1871; d. at Tashvikaya, Istanbul, 26th June 1950), Vizier 1904, former husband of H.I.H. Princess Khadija Sultana - see above. m. (second) at the Ortakoy Palace, 5th June 1910 (morganatical) (div. 1927) Captain Mahmud Bey (b. at Constantinople, 1880; d. 19xx), late Imperial Ottoman Cavalry. She d. at Nice, France, 15th September 1929 (bur. Selimiye Camii, Damascus).

http://web.archive.org/web/20020421155331/http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Turkey/turkey12.htm

Oh what a uncircumcised stupid Man you are ...

Dilek2 (talk) 03:29, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

You have seen fit to continue your personal attacks on this talk page while blocked for exactly this transgression. I have therefore revoked your talk page access for the duration of the block, and if you resume the attacks after the block expires, you will most likely be blocked indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 09:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In view of your obvious block evasion using 91.46.108.243, I have reset your block to last one week from now. I have no idea why I don't just make it indefinite! Favonian (talk) 21:16, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued block evasion. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

additional block evasion at 217.248.140.111‎ (talk · contribs · WHOIS)

additional block evasion at 217.248.140.111‎ (talk · contribs · WHOIS)-- The Red Pen of Doom 23:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sultanzade

The article Sultanzade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Not an official title and not used any more.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. E4024 (talk) 23:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey, a successor ?

Dear Dilek2: I have noticed your sincerity in working with the Ottoman material and have decided to post an opinion here. I hope that's okay.

I do not believe that Turkey is a successor to the Ottoman empire. Turkey seems to be a western style republic which has very little resemblance to the empire. Mehmed VI was priivy to a treaty which displeased his subjects. If the treaty makers were more charitable, they would have ammended or withdrawn that treaty, when they learned that it was a problem for Mehmed VI. Attaturk was only an opportunist who found a way to exploit the situation when Mehmed VI lost power. Turkey does not have a reputation as an ideal republic. Sincerely RCNesland (talk) 04:51, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dilek2. You have new messages at Talk:List of unrecognized heirs of the Ottoman dynasty.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination of List of unrecognized heirs of the Ottoman dynasty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of unrecognized heirs of the Ottoman dynasty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unrecognized heirs of the Ottoman dynasty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Keivan.f^Talk 17:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amuca tribe

A tag has been placed on Amuca tribe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unreferenced since 2012. A lot of fake information. Doubtful even if this tribe exists.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Beshogur (talk) 20:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]