User talk:Dime Dimeski

Welcome!

Hello, Dime Dimeski, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Dime Dimeski, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Schminnte (talk • contribs) 23:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dime Dimeski

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Dime Dimeski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 23:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Димитрија "Диме" Никодиноски (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SunDawn was:

The submission appears to be written in Macedonian. This is the English language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide a high-quality English language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may write it in the Macedonian Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Димитрија "Диме" Никодиноски and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:58, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dime Dimeski! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:58, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:REFB, MOS:CITE and MOS:INCITE to learn how to format and use references properly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:40, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Without inline citations, it's impossible to say how much of this is referenced, but with half the citations to Wikipedia (which cannot be used as a source on Wikipedia!) it's fair to say the referencing is inadequate. Please see WP:REFB for advice on correct referencing using inline citations and footnotes.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Casualdejekyll was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Dime Dimeski, please address the concerns brought up by previous reviewers. The only change you've made to the draft since the previous decline was adding an image gallery - that's not improving the sourcing.

The following Macedonian text was translated by Google Translate and is likely to contain grammatical errors, but I hope it helps:

Ве молиме слушајте што велат луѓето за нацртот. Мора да ги исполнувате нашите референтни стандарди. Ако е тешко да го направите тоа затоа што имате проблеми со англискиот, размислете за уредување на македонската Википедија.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

casualdejekyll 03:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is really going nowhere. Most of the items listed under 'References' (and 'Links') are just links to other Wikipedia articles. The citations are all piled at the end, with no indication of which source supports what content. And the sources that the citations point to, are mostly non-reliable (Blogspot, Medium, LinkedIn, and en.wiki and mk.wiki articles). I'll give this one more try, please reference this properly, including reliable sources only, and ones which actually provide significant coverage of this person, not of some indirectly related matters.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:29, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dimitrija "Dime" Nikodinoski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://medium.com/@dime.dimeski50/dimitrija-dime-nikodinoski-eec5ef43d584. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nobody (talk) 06:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This makes no sense. I have every right to use that text from that website when i've literally wrote and published that text. It's not that hard to understand that the text belongs to me, it literally has my name Dime and last name Dimeski. And it's false that it's a copy, because i've edited it multiple times. You should"ve checked the dates, because this draft's text was published before i even wrote the other text on that website. Your claims make no sense. How can you claim that i coppied something without even checking the dates of publishing. I ask you to remove this nonsense. Dime Dimeski (talk) 11:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has no proof that the medium account is you. Which makes it a copyright violation. If it is you, you can go through VRT to prove it and ask for undeletion. Nobody (talk) 11:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bring back the draft! How can you delete it without having any prove! It's pretty funny how you deleted the draft becase of "copying" another website's text but i wrote that text after i created the Wikipedia draft, which means the website's text is a copy of the draft not vice versa. This shows big unprofessionalism and laziness! So, i ask the draft to be brought back because i've spent weeks writing and translating that draft, and because of someone it seems that all that work was for nothing. Dime Dimeski (talk) 11:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down, no need to be hostile. Read my message above and go through the process. Nobody (talk) 11:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's the reasaon? Dime Dimeski (talk) 14:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the reason for being blocked. I apologise if i did something wrong, i promise won't do it again. It would be nice if you could tell me the exact reason for being blocked so i don't do it again. Hopefully i get unblocked. Dime Dimeski (talk) 14:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]