Jump to content

User talk:Donfbreed2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Donfbreed2, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Donfbreed2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Donfbreed2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! King of Nothing (talk) 17:48, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christo and Jeanne-Claude, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kansas City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Pillars of the Earth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanesque (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for a previous incorrect warning tag

[edit]

Hello Mr. Reed, this is Harryzilber. We briefly wrote a series of notes to each other about six weeks ago when I added a warning tag to your I.P. Talk Page (which you were using at the time). A Wikipedia admin, Toddst1, advised me that my warning tag was inappropriate and after investigating the link that you removed I came to realize that your edit was absolutely not improper. The warning tag I previously added on your I.P. Talk page has been removed and a reminder that edit summaries should be used (when making edits) was left in its place. Please excuse my slip in that regard. Best: HarryZilber (talk) 17:01, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings!

[edit]
Happy children want you to be happy too!

Happy children join me in extending the best possible Season's Greetings to you and your loved ones at this time of year, and if you don't celebrate the usual holidays (Diwali, Xmas, Hanukkah, Eid, Kwanzaa, etc....), then we will still wish you a Happy Festivus. All the best: HarryZilber (talk) 20:14, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elephant gun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalashnikov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Stade Félix Houphouët-Boigny (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Athletics
The Adventure of the Copper Beeches (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Electric blue

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Debt of Honor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Secret Service (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccuracies in the Da Vinci Code

[edit]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edits to Inaccuracies in the Da Vinci Code, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished synthesis of previously published material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here.

In addition, material in Wikipedia must be written in a neutral, formal tone. This precludes unattributed comments about what readers find surprising, and the use of emotive wording, such as exclamation points.

Also, only the first word and proper nouns are capitalized in headings, as per WP:SECTIONHEAD.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 01:40, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that difficulty in finding sources can be frustrating, but that is what is required when adding information, especially (thought not limited to) information of a critical or controversial nature.
I'm not familiar with what JSTOR is, but Wikipedia does not require peer-reviewed journals. It merely requires that sources be reliable, which is detailed at WP:IRS. Peer-review is certainly something that may be needed in certain cases in science-related articles, but not on pop culture or book-related articles like The Da Vinci Code.
I'm not following your comment about the two colons. Can you clarify? Nightscream (talk) 17:16, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding unsourced material and personal viewpoints to Wikipedia, as you did with your edits to Cryptex and List of The Da Vinci Code characters. As I mentioned above, this is prohibited by various policies and guidelines. Nightscream (talk) 16:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sancha of Aragon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Point of view (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gaius Livius Salinator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hasdrubal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hannibal Rising may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Postmortem (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Florsheim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your opinion on Rick Rescorla

[edit]

Hi. An editorial dispute has arisen on the Rick Rescorla article. Can you offer your opinion here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:25, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]