Jump to content

User talk:DonnaK97

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, DonnaK97, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Irn (talk) 22:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well Done[edit]

Hi DonnaK97, You are doing awesome in contributing to Wiki articles for StarPlus shows. Really appreciate your works. However I suggest you to please keep the format and templates of all the shows in constant and in sync with each other. I did that for a few shows yesterday but found you reverted in one show Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon. I reverted it again and made it look similar like other Star Plus shows and most importantly like all other Bollywood and Hollywood movies articles on Wiki. If you feel something to discuss please feel to do it on my talk page. Lets make the articles good enough. Finally keep up the good work buddy.--Msrag (talk) 06:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to ss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon?, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Sparthorse (talk) 07:13, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Aspects (talk) 23:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since you made another revert in a 24-hour period, I have started a section at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DonnaK97 reported by User:Aspects (Result: ). Your participation in the discussion would be appreciated. Aspects (talk) 06:24, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why yu made this edit? The Plot section is clearly in violation of several Wikipedia rules, including WP:V, WP:PLOT and [{WP:NPOV]]. I started a discussion on the talk page but no-one objected to the proposed removal of the Plot section. Please let me know why you reverted my removal, or take the section out again. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 20:03, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon?. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea where you got the idea that you can just hit the revert button for literally every edit made to an article, no matter how benign, but it is not how we do things on Wikipedia. Please take time to understand this or the next time you may be blocked indefinitely. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon?, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Bill william comptonTalk 15:18, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JLK68 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — Bill william comptonTalk 21:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

May 2012[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon?, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon?, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 17:52, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism, as you did at Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon?. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -Philippe (talk) 20:44, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]