User talk:Dr.wallen

Welcome!

Hello, Dr.wallen, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Spencer bonca, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Theopolisme (talk) 17:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spencer bonca

Please do not make articles about a living person that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theopolisme (talk) 17:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:41, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TangoFett. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Canaanite have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! TangoFett (talk) 18:01, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew, you may be blocked from editing. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 21:16, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Plagues of Egypt because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 14:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prescription: indefinite block

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:54, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]