User talk:DrAttendoloSforza

Frontiers[edit]

Is probably a predatory journal and thus not really suitable. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback.I will check my references in the future.

In this case however, Frontiers is not on the list of predatory journals, and it likely shouldn't be. It has been included in a controversial and retracted blacklist years ago, but not for valid reasons. See Nature on the subject.

Besides that it's an argumentum ad hominem towards the research papers publisher and doesn't provides arguments against the actual paper. To quote Lakens (researcher at University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) "the articles people have published in Frontiers are no longer judged based on their own quality, but are now seen as less valuable because Frontiers is on Beall’s list" (Beall is a librarian who created a controversial blacklist, he took it down in januari 2017.)

Most characteristics associated with predatory journals do not apply here.

Several European, north-American and Australian countries and universities have national or consortium open-access agreements with Frontiers or are institutional members. For example: the UK, Yale University and CERN.

Most Frontiers journals are ranked "level 2" in the Norwegian Scientific Index, meaning they are in the top 20% of journals in their field. They even work with the world economic forum, and they are listed as member of COPE and OASPA so it doesn't seem a predatory publisher, they are legit.

Please revert the change. I will make sure to check for the list of predatory journals in the future.

DrAttendoloSforza (talk) 20:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Russian filtration camps[edit]

The lead should summarize the body of the article. The article should be rewritten.Xx236 (talk) 06:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Xylazine. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution[edit]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Great Pacific garbage patch you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 11:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention and for taking the time to add the necessary attribution. Apologies for the oversight. I'm still in the process of learning so I appreciate your guidance. I'll ensure to be more diligent it in the future. kind regards DrAttendoloSforza (talk) 13:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crime in the Netherlands (August 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:Citing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crime in the Netherlands and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DrAttendoloSforza! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Crime in the Netherlands[edit]

Hello, DrAttendoloSforza. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Crime in the Netherlands, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Crime in the Netherlands[edit]

Hello, DrAttendoloSforza. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Crime in the Netherlands".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]