User talk:Dreamofdealers

Dreamofdealers, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dreamofdealers! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:45, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:Reypist, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. TheImaCow (talk) 05:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kodak Black discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:58, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Pizzagate conspiracy theory. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you had no prior edit history, your edits to that article would have gotten you blocked as WP:NOTHERE. I strongly recommend you never edit any articles relating to politics or conspiracy theories. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see you have tried that bullshit before. I'm gonna go ahead and block you from editing that article. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:55, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Explain the emails Dreamofdealers (talk) 11:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Occam's razor (and a complete absence of physical evidence, including Comet Ping Pong not having a basement) would indicate that the emails are to be read at their face value (as being about pizza), and not with some occultist interpretation cooked up by a bunch of neckbeards inbetween rounds of hypocritically sharing pornographic images of underage anime girls. If you continue trying to crusade for that utterly insane delusion, you will be removed from the site.

Now, if you want to complain about actually abducted children, ask immigration services where the kids they had in cages have gone off to -- but not on this site because we're just here to summarize professionally published mainstream academic or journalistic sources and not for other purposes. Ian.thomson (talk) 12:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at YoungBoy Never Broke Again discography, where you removed and moved content. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. Also, please kindly see WP:V; everything you add to an article needs to be attributed to a reliable source - the peaks you added were wholly unsourced as Billboard.com has not updated yet. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AshMusique (talk) 22:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The peaks came from Billboard charts I will add the source now Dreamofdealers (talk) 22:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kobe Bryant

Why did you remove that statement from Kobe Bryant’s page? AfroWorld33 (talk) 19:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at YoungBoy Never Broke Again discography, where you removed content. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Also, please make use of edit summaries. Thank you. AshMusique (talk) 18:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dreamofdealers. Thank you. AshMusique (talk) 09:39, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 22:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dreamofdealers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn’t using a second account, I wasn’t signed in at all because of another user who began reverting my edits because I reverted one of theirs and the edits I made were never vandalism I occasionally didn’t put sources because the sources were already on the articles. Dreamofdealers (talk) 08:43, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, this is why you were blocked, but you don't say how things will be different going forward. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dreamofdealers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know the importance of adding sources and explaining my reasons for edits now. I made errors but I learned from them and want to continue contributing to this site. I don’t plan on making edits when signed out of my account anymore and I don’t want to repeat the mistakes I made in the past.

Decline reason:

You were deliberately harming Wikipedia. These weren't innocent mistakes, this was a deliberate attack by you on the project. I see no reason why we should unblock you, I see no reason to believe you'd be constructive here. Nothing in your unblock request comes remotely close to addressing the problems. Yamla (talk) 13:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:YoungBoy Make No Sense.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YoungBoy Make No Sense.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]