User talk:Dred05m

Welcome!

Hello, Dred05m, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Fumi Kumatani, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Yasht 101 06:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fumi Kumatani

The article Fumi Kumatani has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Yasht 101 06:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, you may be blocked from editing. Dougweller (talk) 09:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page The Protocols of the Elders of Zion has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 09:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note please that if you continue to make edits or edit summaries like these you will almost certainly be blocked. You not only made edits that radically changed the article (and which were not what the sources in the article said), your edit summaries showed that you knew you were doing this. You weren't removing incorrect information or making minor corrections. Your edits also appear to show an anti-Semitic agenda and there's no room for such agendas at Wikipedia. Dougweller (talk) 10:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Elder of Ziyon. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 11:22, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring my warning and then going to another article and among other things changing quotations with another deliberately misleading edit summary suggests strongly that you are not here to build the encyclopedia. Next time is likely to be much more than a short block. If I find you making any such changes to articles dealing with Jewish issues you will probably be either topic banned or indefinitely blocked. Dougweller (talk) 11:25, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your email but please keep correspondence to your talk page. Being here to expose the truth is not what we are looking for at all. And "for me a book of 417 pages cannot solely be called fraudulent or have been a forgery," is an opinion you can hold but is irrelevant to Wikipedia, see WP:NOR. It also isn't logical. Dougweller (talk) 06:25, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sega Genesis Mini, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SOC and Emulation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alpha Protocol. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. --Sek-2 (talk) 00:48, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2023 Marrakesh-Safi earthquake

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023 Marrakesh-Safi earthquake, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]