User talk:Insc36

January 2017[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Pallimukkom sree bhadrakali temple, from its old location at User:Drsarathsnair/sandbox/Pallimukkom sree bhadrakali temple. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 15:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Drsarathsnair, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Drsarathsnair! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pallimukkom sree bhadrakali temple (January 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The temple may be notable, but we require multiple, reliable, arm's length sources to provide evidence of it as described above. You may also take a look at User:Joe Decker/IsThisNotable. I'm still working on refining it, but my hope is to provide a more step-by-step (if still not simple) approach to explaining what we need in terms of demonstrating notability. I hope that it will be helpful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pallimukkom sree bhadrakali temple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker ^talk 02:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pallimukkom sree bhadrakali temple (January 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not only the formatting of the lead and the body is troublesome, what's more problematic is there are no WP:RS which describes notability.Wikipedia is nota reference for Wikipedia.See WP:CIRCULAR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pallimukkom sree bhadrakali temple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winged Blades^Godric 14:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pallimukkom sree bhadrakali temple has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pallimukkom sree bhadrakali temple. Thanks! Winged Blades^Godric 14:40, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pallimukkom sree bhadrakali temple[edit]

Hello, Drsarathsnair. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pallimukkom sree bhadrakali temple".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:56, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]