User talk:DuranDurar

October 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to NeoGAF has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: NeoGAF was changed by DuranDurar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950151 on 2016-10-26T01:05:25+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:05, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at NeoGAF, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Most of that was completely unsourced, and the one source you did use is worthless. Blogs are not reliable sources. Meters (talk) 01:12, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to NeoGAF while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Meters (talk) 01:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at NeoGAF shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
It is an improiperly souced addition which has been challenged. It cannot be added back to the article without proper sources. Meters (talk) 01:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DuranDurar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DuranDurar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Star Wars: Aftermath

You have already been informed about WP:RS here, so regarding this edit to Star Wars: Aftermath, user comments/reviews are not acceptable sources.— TAnthony^Talk 05:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]