User talk:DvDknight

DvDknight (talk · contribs · page moves · current autoblocks · block log)

D-die v-vandal D-die knight-a crusader!!! This page is created to destroy vandals in their tracks. Watch out vandals!☺

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:Chacor, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. (→Netscott) 17:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning. The vandalism you did at User:Chacor will not be tolerated, and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia next time.

--Cometstyles 17:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a good Excuse because thats not posible and Pliz dont edit anymore because I have reported you to WP:AIV and Wikipedia doesnt take vandalism nicely..--Cometstyles 17:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gaffney High School[edit]

The contents you have added is completely unformatted, and I am not sure that it's even encyclopedic (I guess the other editors will decide it; I have listed it at WP:CU). Please see Wikipedia:How to edit a page and Wikipedia:Manual of style for instructions on proper layout of an article. Regards, Mike Rosoft 18:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CU is just a shortcut for Wikipedia:Cleanup, a listing of pages in need of edits. Nothing will get fixed automatically, but chance is that another user will have a look at it. Personally, I am not even sure where to start; a part of the problem is that lines starting with a space will be displayed as unformatted, fixed-with font text. By the way, where did you get the text? Did you write it yourself, or did you happen to take it from the school website or another outside source? The latter case would be a problem, since you can't use copyrighted material on Wikipedia without a permission of the copyright holder. (See Wikipedia:Copyrights for details.) - Mike Rosoft 18:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have attempted to clean up the format of the article; it will probably need to be radically trimmed (and rewritten into prose, not just lists). The copyright will probably note pose a problem, since a mere listing of facts can't be copyrighted. - Mike Rosoft 19:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's better than it was (at least, it's readable). It probably still needs some work, but it's not somehing I can help you with, so I'll leave it to others. - Mike Rosoft 19:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DvDknight (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This "dormanfan" was on this computer before I was. i am currently at the public library and I just wanted to pick up some good edits before I start my research project. please unblock me

Decline reason:

You have no active block. See below. — Sandstein 21:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Clearing an autoblock[edit]

Please note that we cannot unblock you at this time because you have not given us the information we need to look into your block. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review your block or lift it. If you are still autoblocked by the time you read this message, please follow these instructions:

If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
Try and edit the Wikipedia:Sandbox by clicking here.
Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "Autoblocked?" section.
Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. Sandstein 21:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-auto|This "dormanfan" was on this computer before I was. i am currently at the public library and I just wanted to pick up some good edits before I start my research project. please unblock me}}

No, this does not work like that. Please follow the above instructions exactly. Sandstein 05:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA[edit]

I closed your request for adminship on the grounds that there was no chance of it passing. You can certainly be an admin in the future, so long as you work on everything pointed out in the RfA. Plus, it's a good idea to try and not get blocked :)--Wizardman 16:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

This is your FINAL WARNING. Edits like this are not tolerated, and continuing to do them WILL result in a long block. – Chacor 02:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was a disruptive edit. Do not disrupt Wikipedia. – Chacor 13:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gaffney High School (again)[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Gaffney High School. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. (This only applies to one external link). Thank you.

Rjgodoy 02:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have commented some sections of this article (which you were editing). I suggest you copypaste and restate them as prose. Rjgodoy 02:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize of my edit at 2007-03-29T01:58:57 on Gaffney High School article. I have reverted it now, placing the aproppiate templates for discusion (I should not delete the content until consensus is reached). Rjgodoy 05:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You said that

"This page has no way of being encyclopedic" (13:54, 30 March 2007 UTC)

and

" There is no way a high school will be in the encyclopedia." (16:27, 30 March 2007  UTC).

I think there are ways, but someone familiar with the school should clean the article. If no such person does exist, and if you consider the article is unencyclopedic, it should be deleted. That is what I meant. Rjgodoy 17:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! I saw you have performed some rewriting with the article... that was what I was asking for. Thank you. Rjgodoy 19:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neck hard[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Neck hard) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --EarthPerson 16:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==Speedy deletion of Neck hard==

A tag has been placed on Neck hard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Non-notable neologism, no assertion of notability per CSD A7

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 16:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Re-creation of Deleted Article[edit]

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Neck hard which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. --Proofreader J-Man 03:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by threats to another user. This block is for a week. It is obvious from your talk page that your behaviour is generally out of order, so I suggest you think carefully if you want to continue on wikipedia. If so, then you need to change your outlook. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. The edit in question is here.[1] Tyrenius 04:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am very upset that the block was not longer he is a menace to wikipedia--Spideyfan1227 16:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC)--Spideyfan1227 16:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 72.159.134.195 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Yamla 16:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

editprotected[edit]

What page did you want to be edited? This page and your user page seem to be unprotected. CMummert · talk 20:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 72.159.134.195 lifted or expired. Request handled by: John Reaves (talk) 21:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mitt Romney[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Mitt Romney. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Tdl1060 17:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mitt Romney, you will be blocked from editing. (Diff) Sandstein 20:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DvDknight (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry for the vandalism of Mitt Romney's page. I was just joking around, but I forgot to revert my vandalism. Again, I am very sorry.

Decline reason:

A rash of unblock requests derived from this block has made it abundantly clear that you are a sockpuppeteer operating many vandalism accounts. Block extended to indefinite. Mango juice^talk 14:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Image copyright problem with Image:Bigpeach.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bigpeach.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]