User talk:EEfamilytrees

Proposed deletion of File:Will Mitchell.jpg

The file File:Will Mitchell.jpg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Will Mitchell.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Will Mitchell.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent images of EastEnders actors

Hi! I recently noticed that you have been adding images of multiple actors' EastEnders characters in their infoboxes. This should not be done as these files are non-free. The only exception is if the actor is deceased and there is no free images of them. FishLoveHam (talk) 20:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise. I thought because they were already on the character pages, they must already be free. If you could explain more about it to me, that'd be greatly appreciated as I do want to try be a good editor on the EastEnders part of Wikipedia. EEfamilytrees (talk) 23:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All I can really encourage you to do is read WP:Non-free content for a better understanding.

FishLoveHam (talk) 23:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I just want to know where to start with making new EastEnders articles. Preferably the easiest to help me improve. You seem like a good editor to teach me. EEfamilytrees (talk) 06:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sharon Watts in 2023.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sharon Watts in 2023.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IMBD

Hey, I hope you are doing well. I saw that in your edits that you are adding information from IMBD in actor biographies. IMBD is not considered a reliable source and should not be used (though it is permisable for external links), but also the information you are adding (specifically the names of the actors' parents and children) should not be included in the infobox unless it is particularly notable or they have their own Wikipedia article. Please let me know if you have any questions! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Alexandrou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Fowler. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page moved to your user space

Hi, I moved EEfamilytrees/Will Mitchell to User:EEfamilytrees/Will Mitchell as it seems like that was likely what you intended. Feel free to move it to WP:DRAFT space i you think that is a better fit. I'd advice expanding out evidence of notability beyond just a single BBC link if you want this character to have a stand alone page as Will Mitchell already redirects to a fairly comprehensive section in List of EastEnders characters introduced in 2007 § Will Mitchell. Happy editing! Skynxnex (talk) 18:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Can you please delete the old one? EEfamilytrees (talk) 19:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, yeah. I've started making it but won't think about completing it until I have absolutely everything possible there EEfamilytrees (talk) 19:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the page is now up to date. You can check it if you like. I personally don't think it's ready and we need to wait for more information for the development and reception section in the future. EEfamilytrees (talk) 20:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of EEfamilytrees/Will Mitchell

Hello EEfamilytrees,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged EEfamilytrees/Will Mitchell for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Killarnee (talk) 19:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Billy and Phil 1979

Hi EEfamilytrees. I just wanted to inform you that I have removed two images you uploaded, File:Phil Mitchell 1979.png and File:Billy Mitchell 1979.png. This is because while they are alternate portrayals, they were only for one episode. Having an illustration of these portrayals is not necessary, as Wikipedia pages should use as little non-free media as possible. Thanks. FishLoveHam (talk) 21:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, should the Lorraine Stanley picture be removed on Mo's page as that wasn't even in the show, but a special. EEfamilytrees (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you insist, I guess. FishLoveHam (talk) 11:34, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional character images

Hi EEfamilytrees. When you updating fictional character images like File:Tracy Barlow.jpg, it would be a big help if you could also (1) update the file's non-free use rationale to reflect the new image and (2) add Template:Orphaned non-free revisions to the top of the file's page. If, for example, you replace an existing file with a new screenshot you take, adding the name/number of the episode to the |source= parameter of the file's non-free use rationale can help let others know where the image comes from. In addition, revisions of non-free files that are no longer being used are eligible for speedy deletion per WP:F5; so, tagging such files as such just saves a bot or another user from have to do so later on. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Billy Mitchell 1979.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Billy Mitchell 1979.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Phil Mitchell 1979.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phil Mitchell 1979.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Claudette Hubbard (EastEnders)

Hi User:EEfamilytrees great work so far! could you please make Claudette Hubbard her own page? Her section is detailed enough for an article. You may have to create it at Claudette Hubbard (EastEnders) due to the page being locked. Thanks!2A00:23EE:16A8:AC55:6064:5D23:B8A9:B7CC (talk) 15:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Penny page

I will look at your Penny Branning sandbox later, and I'll leave you feedback here. I'm already unsure about her notability as she has only had one storyline, but I'll keep an open mind. FishLoveHam (talk) 07:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did consider that. That’s why I’ve started it early so I can slowly edit it through time before it’s ready. Then that way, my experience can only increase. EEfamilytrees (talk) 15:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope it's a good time but I'm just reminding you about this just in case you've forgotten as it's been a week. Thanks. :) EEfamilytrees (talk) 11:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a busy week, but I can now comment on it for you!

Lead

The lead of the article is written very in-universe and is not understandable for a general reader. This article should begin with: Penny Branning (any other names) is a fictional character from the BBC soap opera EastEnders. She was played by Mia McKenna-Bruce in 2008 and Kitty Castledine since 2024. Then say she was introduced as Jack's disabled daughter, the timeline of her first stint and return, her storylines, etc.
There are excessive citations in the lead, usually citations are only used in the lead if it is to support a quote.
This article has a huge problem with original research, and it hampers its quality.
- "plot device" is not backed up in the article.
When introducing a character with an apostrophe, it is better placed after the character's name, not the actor's. Example: "Whitney Dean's (Shona McGarty)", not "Whitney Dean (Shona McGarty)'s"
"given a recent management job" the inclusion of "recent" will age like milk, and somewhat violates Wikipedia's policy of in-universe information. "the crowd crush" is written as if the reader knows about it, when that isn't how Wikipedia articles should be written. It isn't a wiki, this should be understandable to a broad general audience.
"including" is odd word choice.

Storylines

For a character with very few storylines, this section is somewhat inflated. The 2008 can be trimmed to one paragraph, as she appeared in five episodes, and the 2024 section is excessively detailed and full of fluff; namely how the first two paragraphs can be merged and trimmed, how she and Lauren bought their house, her activities at work (especially since it rarely matters to her narrative), giving Eve relationship advice, Lauren's 30th party, visiting her mother, and getting Avani into trouble, these may be semi-enjojyable character moments, but they are not storylines. Generally trimming things appropriately, you only really need France and her arrival, her helping Amy with relationships and relationship(?) with Harry, and her feud with Chelsea and the crush. Additionally, the article begins new paragraphs in odd places, the crush can share a paragraph with the feud with Chelsea.
Citation usage here is inconsistent, per MOS:PLOTSOURCE, citations are unnecessary.
Easy traps to fall into are introducing characters who aren't important to Penny's narratives, detailing unnecessary encounters, and writing things with a biased perspective.
The grammar is rather poor, and this isn't a formal review, so I won't get into it, but it is looking at a start-class rating at best.

Development

The creation and casting heading isn't very appropriate for the section, as it fails to delve into her creation and her casting. It also doesn't discuss her new actress, so the heading would more appropriately be named "Original stint" or "2008 stint". It also looks very short, so expansion is possible. I also don't see the necessity to list her appearances here.
Outside of the lead and storylines section, you need a citation to back everything up. If not, it could be treated as original research.
The block quote is very long, consider cutting parts of it and paraphrasing.
Quote marks aren't good, read MOS:CURLY.
Again, new paragraphs are taken when unneeded, the last two of the "return" section can be merged.
Try to expand the "personality" section.
The relationships section isn't great, just repeating storylines. The Jack Branning heading is particularly blatant, as it is original research. The Chelsea Fox section at least has a quote, but even then it isn't substantial commentary on their relationship. My advice would be to remove the Jack Branning section.

Reception

Do not cite a forum for Reception (WP:RSOPINION)

Other

At the bottom of the page, add: template:reflist, template:EastEnders characters, and any appropriate categories.

When was her name stated as being Penelope? FishLoveHam (talk) 14:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Another thing, add a colon in front of every category until the article is published. This prevents it from appearing on category pages. FishLoveHam (talk) 14:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Juliette Dubois repeatedly called her Penelope. And yes, I'll do the category thing now. Thanks for all your help. :) EEfamilytrees (talk) 14:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, if her full name is Penelope, it's better to put that in the infobox next to the "alias" parameter.

add

| alias = Penelope Branning

to the infobox, and change the lead to "Penny Branning is..." Generally, it's not great to use two names in the intro unless the character frequently goes by both. (eg. Tom "Rocky" Cotton and Fatboy) FishLoveHam (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's fair. It'll just confuse the audience. EEfamilytrees (talk) 15:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey EEfamilytrees, just got news Penny is leaving, but if you still wanna work on this I have a source for you. [1] FishLoveHam (talk) 12:14, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, from what I've seen Penny is not leaving the show but the character is set to leave the square, so I intend to continue the page. Thank you for the source. EEfamilytrees (talk) 16:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Navin Chowdhry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I Love NY (film).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:EEfamilytrees/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:EEfamilytrees/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JuneGloom07 Talk 00:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:EEfamilytrees/Josh Wilson (EastEnders)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:EEfamilytrees/Josh Wilson (EastEnders) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JuneGloom07 Talk 00:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Suggesting you check-out MOS:DATETOPRES and MOS:SINCE. Wikipedia has an ever-evolving style manual for their articles to follow. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kit Green 2024.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kit Green 2024.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eastenders Characters

Keep the duration of characters consistent with other articles about prior Eastenders characters please.

"Year-present" is the accepted format across all character pages NO exception GuyFromEE (talk) 07:56, 1 December 2024 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rain the 1 18:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saw you're making a Bernadette page correct?

For as much as we disagreed on the duration presentation (Nice to see that beiing settled and accurate), your work overall on creating pages is very good. With Bernadette receiving one I believe, have you considered Vinny and Lee Carter? Believe they're the two most needing of pages as their sections are getting overstuffed. GuyFromEE (talk) 17:09, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lee and Vinny

Have you considered making pages for Lee Carter and Vinny Panesar?

Lee Carter especially his section is getting VERY long and could do with a dedicated wikipedia entry. With his depression storyline i believe there's enough there to warrant one.

With Vinny, i find it surprising he hasn't received one but characters like Aaron Monroe, Mila Mawa and his brother Jags have?

Outside of the presentation of duration, your work on the pages has been fantastic. GuyFromEE (talk) 17:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but yeah, of course, I could do that. There's a few characters who have been here years who I think only don't have pages because they're disliked, mainly Vinny and Bernadette. EEfamilytrees (talk) 17:20, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That could be reason. Not sure that should be the barometer for who gets a page (not accusing you of that at all) personally.

If you could that would be fantastic. Keep up the good work! GuyFromEE (talk) 18:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]