User talk:ERAgostinho

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ERAgostinho, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Scholartop (talk) 07:15, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello, I'd need help with a translated page - which was already approved in French Wikipedia.

I understand it is for confirmed users but the content is accurate. Just need some help in getting it going. I have been waiting for the community help for 4 months already ...

Would love to cite that page on a dissertation...

Best

Erica ERAgostinho (talk) 09:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As noted on your draft, "This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,256 pending submissions waiting for review." Please be patient. Everyone awaiting a review would like their draft to be reviewed next. You are now autoconfirmed, if you are 90% confident that your draft would survive a deletion discussion, you may move it to the encyclopedia yourself as long as you have no conflict of interest. Any third party deadlines are not our concern- Wikipedia should not be used as a citation for a scholarly work, you should use the sources that you based the article on. See Wikipedia:General disclaimer and Wikipedia is not a reliable source. 331dot (talk) 12:15, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. USeful indeed. There is definitely no conflict of interest and I am 90% sure the page wouldn't be deleted as such. Will try to see how I can move it. Thank you again and noted for the citation... ERAgostinho (talk) 13:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frédéric Jenny (August 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frédéric Jenny and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Fiddle, frederic jenny is a notable figure in the antitrust community. Everyone knows him, there are other figures like prof allain fels who have pages so I dont’t see why you don’t judge thia notable

enough. True it is my first article but I did use external

sources as much as I

could. Can you help

me

understand what could be improved?

best, Erica 37.167.78.215 (talk) 10:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ERAgostinho! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i have the impression this is an authomated reply to any comment I would make. Can you please at least read it? An academic and french economiat is definetely notable enough. French wikipedia has accepted it… ERAgostinho (talk) 10:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Frédéric jenny[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Frédéric jenny. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Frédéric Jenny. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Frédéric Jenny. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I contested this and instead swapped the pages and redirected Frédéric jenny to Frédéric Jenny. SilverLocust 💬 10:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Frédéric Jenny[edit]

Hello, ERAgostinho. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frédéric Jenny".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]