User talk:Edf55

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Edf55, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 13:11, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses: Gracias

Buddy Guy and Kenny Chesney[edit]

I'm going to ask you to stop changing back there images. If you continue to do so then you will be blocked from editing, no exceptions, thank you. Matt Campbell (talk) 16:00, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No tienes derecho!!Edf55 (talk) 16:03, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speak English please? Matt Campbell (talk) 16:04, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have no right!!Edf55 (talk) 16:05, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Right to what? You are going to have to be specific with what you are talking about? Matt Campbell (talk) 16:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard Edf55 (talk) 16:09, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your still not being specific. I hate to do this but i may speak to an administrator about this. Matt Campbell (talk) 16:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK Im sorry but your wrong.Edf55 (talk) 16:15, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Larry is a bad man.

Who's Larry? and you need to sign your post's at all times. and explain what I'm wrong about. Matt Campbell (talk) 16:18, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Larry es el fotógrafo, extorsiona a los usuarios.Edf55 (talk) 16:20, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speak English. Matt Campbell (talk) 16:20, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He's claiming that "Larry" extorts people. Edf55, I concur with Matt Campbell. This behavior saying "you have no right" has to stop. Every edit you make here is irrevocably released under CC BY-SA 3.0 License. Anyone has a right to change your edits. If you're not comfortable with that, you are in the wrong place. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:08, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please jail this user Edf55 (talk) 17:27, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Matt Campbell (talk) 17:27, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "Jail this user"? Matt Campbell (talk) 17:29, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Im sorry Im not mean but Larry is bad.Edf55 (talk) 17:29, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who's Larry? Matt Campbell (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

El fotógrafo!!Edf55 (talk) 17:33, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Did you not read what was written saying that "Anyone has a right to change your edits"?. Matt Campbell (talk) 17:35, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

¿Qué?Edf55 (talk) 17:39, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speak English please? Matt Campbell (talk) 17:40, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update. Just to give you some heads up your edits on Buddy Guy and Kenny Chesney have been change back to what they were. Matt Campbell (talk) 18:09, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

locoEdf55 (talk) 18:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speak English. Matt Campbell (talk) 18:37, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:07, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANEW[edit]

Stop posting to WP:ANEW. An administrator has already disposed of the report. The only thing important for you is to understand what the administrator said so you don't find yourself sanctioned in the future.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:28, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of things[edit]

Hey. I see you got into a conflict with Matt Campbell which degenerated into an edit war after he was extremely rude to you here on your talk page. While I totally agree he was acting like a WP:DICK, I'd like to give you some friendly advice:

Please respond and communicate in English. Yo entiendo español pero you'll look like you're being disruptive if you reply, even in an edit summary in Spanish on the English Wikipedia.
Don't take Matt's bait and edit war. Let him be an autocrat and try to WP:OWN pages - but address that (the ownership) without getting in to an edit war. Look at the history of his talk page and numerous admins have warned him about WP:OWN and generally being extremely difficult to work with. Several of us have come to the conclusion that he fails WP:CIR.

I hope you receive with the good faith I intended. Toddst1 (talk) 04:56, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddst1 thank you.Edf55 (talk) 07:53, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Outing warning[edit]

Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about a user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors may result in you being blocked from editing. Daniel Case (talk) 06:36, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case ?????????????????????????????????????????Edf55 (talk) 07:53, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Edf55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Jmabel and Jeff G. help, they <redacted - do that again and you'll find your block extended and your access to this page revoked> and denounce me because I protect the users. Edf55 (talk) 16:42, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:08, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock decline July 9, 2019[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Edf55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wont do edit war.Please ask Jeff G. he knows Im good.

Decline reason:

(Because of the OUTing behavior, we should make this block indefinite, but see below.)
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. You have not adequately addressed the reason for your block.

Please see our policy on edit warring. In the event of a content dispute, editors are required to stop reverting, discuss, and seek consensus among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.

Points to ponder:

Edit warring is wrong even if one is right.

Any arguments in favor of one's preferred version should be made on the relevant talk page and not in an unblock appeal.

Calling attention to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior.

To be unblocked, you must affirm an understanding of all of this, and what not to do, and what to do when in a content dispute. Thanks, Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:43, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Jeff G. please help me. He accuses me of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OUT, but he has no proofs. I do not understand. I wont do edit war. I wont noticeboard. I do siesta and forget. I do not want to be denounced.Edf55 (talk) 10:22, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]